• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期实体肿瘤患者化疗的相对剂量强度与生存:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Nielson Carrie M, Bylsma Lauren C, Fryzek Jon P, Saad Hossam A, Crawford Jeffrey

机构信息

Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.

EpidStrategies, A Division of ToxStrategies, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):e1609-e1618. doi: 10.1002/onco.13822. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1002/onco.13822
PMID:33973301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8417866/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced toxicities lead to therapy dose reduction or delay, affecting patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) on survival in adult patients with solid tumor cancer on nonadjuvant-based chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for peer-reviewed English journal articles or congress abstracts evaluating association between RDI and survival; observational studies, case series of ≥20 patients, and clinical trials published between 2013 and 2020 were eligible. Meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the association between RDI levels and overall survival (OS) among studies reporting a hazard ratio (HR) for OS by similar tumor types, regimens, and RDI. Forest plots represented summary HR and 95% confidence interval (CI); Cochran's Q and I tests evaluated study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, 919 articles were reviewed and 22 included; seven were eligible for meta-analysis. Significantly shorter OS at RDI <80% versus ≥80% and <85% versus ≥85% was observed upon meta-analysis of four carboplatin-based studies for breast, non-small cell lung, or ovarian cancer (HR 1.17; 95% CI: 1.07-1.27) and three FOLFOX-, FOLFIRI-, or FOLFIRINOX-based studies for colorectal or pancreatic cancer (HR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.03-1.89). Grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicities were higher for carboplatin-based regimens (thrombocytopenia: 14%-22%; anemia: 15%-19%; neutropenia: 24%-58%) than FOLFOX-, FOLFIRI-, or FOLFIRINOX-based regimens (thrombocytopenia: 1%-4%; anemia: 5%-19%; neutropenia: 19%-47%).

CONCLUSION

The results suggested longer OS with RDI ≥80% or ≥85% for both regimens, indicating that management of toxicities across treatment modalities may contribute to maintenance of higher RDI and benefit survival for patients with advanced solid tumors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Chemotherapy-induced toxicities lead to dose reduction and/or treatment delay, thus affecting patient outcomes. Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, evaluating the impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) on survival of patients with solid tumors on nonadjuvant-based chemotherapy regimens, demonstrate a longer overall survival with RDI levels of at least 80% for patients with solid tumors on carboplatin-based and FOLFOX-, FOLFIRI-, or FOLFIRINOX-based chemotherapy regimens, suggesting a protective effect of maintaining RDI ≥80% or ≥ -85%. Although grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicities occurred more in carboplatin-based studies, managing toxicities across treatment regimens may contribute to maintenance of higher RDI and ultimately benefit overall survival.

摘要

背景

化疗引起的毒性反应会导致治疗剂量减少或延迟,从而影响患者的治疗效果。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了相对剂量强度(RDI)对接受非辅助化疗方案的成年实体瘤癌症患者生存的影响。

方法

在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库中检索评估RDI与生存之间关联的同行评审英文期刊文章或会议摘要;符合条件的是2013年至2020年发表的观察性研究、≥20例患者的病例系列以及临床试验。对报告了按相似肿瘤类型、方案和RDI划分的总生存(OS)风险比(HR)的研究进行荟萃分析,以量化RDI水平与OS之间的关联。森林图表示汇总HR和95%置信区间(CI);Cochran's Q和I检验评估研究异质性。

结果

总体而言,共审查了919篇文章,纳入22篇;7篇符合荟萃分析条件。对四项基于卡铂的乳腺癌、非小细胞肺癌或卵巢癌研究进行荟萃分析时,观察到RDI<80%与≥80%以及<85%与≥85%相比,OS显著缩短(HR 1.17;95%CI:1.07 - 1.27);对三项基于FOLFOX、FOLFIRI或FOLFIRINOX的结直肠癌或胰腺癌研究进行荟萃分析时,观察到RDI<80%与≥80%以及<85%与≥85%相比,OS显著缩短(HR 1.39;95%CI:1.03 - 1.89)。基于卡铂的方案3级或更高等级血液学毒性高于基于FOLFOX、FOLFIRI或FOLFIRINOX的方案(血小板减少:14% - 22%;贫血:15% - 19%;中性粒细胞减少:24% - 58%)(血小板减少:1% - 4%;贫血:5% - 19%;中性粒细胞减少:19% - 47%)。

结论

结果表明两种方案RDI≥80%或≥85%时OS更长,这表明跨治疗方式管理毒性反应可能有助于维持较高的RDI并使晚期实体瘤患者受益。

对实践的启示

化疗引起的毒性反应会导致剂量减少和/或治疗延迟,从而影响患者的治疗效果。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了相对剂量强度(RDI)对接受非辅助化疗方案的实体瘤患者生存的影响,结果表明接受基于卡铂和基于FOLFOX、FOLFIRI或FOLFIRINOX化疗方案的实体瘤患者,RDI水平至少为80%时总生存更长,这表明维持RDI≥80%或≥85%具有保护作用。尽管基于卡铂的研究中3级或更高等级血液学毒性发生率更高,但跨治疗方案管理毒性反应可能有助于维持较高的RDI并最终使总生存受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/5ffa194b6840/ONCO-26-e1609-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/85c8a459e09d/ONCO-26-e1609-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/dc72acbc96ff/ONCO-26-e1609-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/3118b4321e0a/ONCO-26-e1609-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/3216c91000ea/ONCO-26-e1609-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/5ffa194b6840/ONCO-26-e1609-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/85c8a459e09d/ONCO-26-e1609-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/dc72acbc96ff/ONCO-26-e1609-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/3118b4321e0a/ONCO-26-e1609-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/3216c91000ea/ONCO-26-e1609-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd77/8417866/5ffa194b6840/ONCO-26-e1609-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.晚期实体肿瘤患者化疗的相对剂量强度与生存:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):e1609-e1618. doi: 10.1002/onco.13822. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Real-world safety and supportive care use of second-line 5-fluorouracil-based regimens among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.转移性胰腺导管腺癌患者二线基于氟尿嘧啶的方案的真实世界安全性和支持性护理应用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Aug;38(8):1295-1303. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2059976. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Platinum-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌的含铂方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 23;6(6):CD003374. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003374.pub4.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Meta-analysis examining overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with second-line 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based therapy after failing first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy: effect of performance status and comparison with other regimens.分析二线氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂联合治疗在一线吉西他滨治疗失败的胰腺癌患者总生存期的荟萃分析:体力状况的影响及与其他方案的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07110-x.
6
Cisplatin versus carboplatin in combination with third-generation drugs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.顺铂与卡铂联合第三代药物治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 13;1(1):CD009256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009256.pub3.
7
Comparison of first-line chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for people with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma.对早期预后不良或晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,比较包括强化BEACOPP方案的一线化疗与包括ABVD方案的化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD007941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007941.pub3.
8
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing carboplatin-based to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.一项比较以卡铂为基础的化疗与以顺铂为基础的化疗用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2007 Sep;57(3):348-58. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 7.
9
Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.对于晚期非小细胞肺癌、体能状态 2 且无靶向突变或未知突变状态的患者,最佳一线治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
10
Reduction in chemotherapy relative dose intensity decreases overall survival of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.新辅助放化疗中降低化疗相对剂量强度会降低局部晚期食管癌患者的总生存期。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12724-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: an age subgroup analysis from a phase IV real-world clinical practice study.呋喹替尼在中国结直肠癌患者中的安全性:一项IV期真实世界临床实践研究的年龄亚组分析
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Sep 1;17:17588359251363537. doi: 10.1177/17588359251363537. eCollection 2025.
2
Should thrombopoietin receptor agonists be used for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia?血小板生成素受体激动剂是否应用于化疗所致的血小板减少症?
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jul 22;9(5):102980. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102980. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Relative Dose Intensity of Trabectedin and Outcome of Advanced L-Sarcomas.

本文引用的文献

1
Docetaxel dose-intensity effect on overall survival in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.多西他赛剂量强度对转移性去势敏感前列腺癌患者总生存期的影响。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 May;85(5):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04063-7. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hematopoietic Growth Factors, Version 1.2020.NCCN 指南解读:造血生长因子,第 1.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Jan;18(1):12-22. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0002.
3
Body Composition, Adherence to Anthracycline and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy, and Survival After Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.
曲贝替定的相对剂量强度与晚期L型肉瘤的预后
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(16):e71131. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71131.
4
De-Escalating Anticancer Treatment: Watch Your Step.降低抗癌治疗强度:谨慎行事。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 26;17(15):2474. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152474.
5
Biweekly CAPOX versus triweekly CAPOX in the adjuvant therapy of post-surgery CRC: A randomized controlled trial.双周与三周方案的 CAPOX 用于术后结直肠癌辅助治疗的随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0313472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313472. eCollection 2025.
6
Sex differences in toxicity and outcomes in patients with sarcoma treated in the perioperative setting at a comprehensive cancer center.在一家综合癌症中心接受围手术期治疗的肉瘤患者中,毒性和预后的性别差异。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 26;15:1585884. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1585884. eCollection 2025.
7
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Receiving Systemic Treatment Using Step Count Data Measured With Smartphones.使用智能手机测量的步数数据对接受全身治疗的癌症患者临床结局进行基于机器学习的预测。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jul;9:e2500023. doi: 10.1200/CCI-25-00023. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
8
Influence of Puncture Devices on the Accuracy of Cyclophosphamide Dosing for Chemotherapy Administration.穿刺装置对化疗给药中 cyclophosphamide 剂量准确性的影响。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;18(6):879. doi: 10.3390/ph18060879.
9
Effects of aerobic or resistance exercise during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumor response and therapy completion in women with breast cancer: The randomized controlled BENEFIT trial.新辅助化疗期间进行有氧运动或抗阻运动对乳腺癌女性肿瘤反应及治疗完成情况的影响:随机对照BENEFIT试验
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 May 28;14:101064. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101064.
10
Oncoral Follow-Up for Outpatients Treated with Oral Anticancer Drugs Assessed by Relative Dose Intensity.通过相对剂量强度评估口服抗癌药物治疗门诊患者的昂科瑞随访。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 13;18(4):565. doi: 10.3390/ph18040565.
非转移性乳腺癌患者的身体成分、蒽环类和紫杉类化疗药物的依从性与生存
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):264-270. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4668.
4
The incidence and clinical burden of immune thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients in the United States.美国儿科患者免疫性血小板减少症的发病率和临床负担。
Platelets. 2020;31(3):307-314. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2019.1635687. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
The efficacy and safety of nab paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly patients over 75 years with unresectable pancreatic cancer compared with younger patients.与年轻患者相比,高龄(≥75 岁)不可切除胰腺癌患者使用白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨的疗效和安全性。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;84(3):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03895-2. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
6
Relative dose intensity of first-line chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.一线化疗的相对剂量强度与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Feb;28(2):925-932. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04875-1. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
Feasibility of initial treatment in elderly patients with ovarian cancer in Japan: a retrospective study.日本老年卵巢癌患者初始治疗的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1111-1118. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01449-3. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Influence of initial dose intensity on efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.初始剂量强度对晚期胰腺癌患者FOLFIRINOX疗效的影响。
Oncotarget. 2019 Mar 5;10(19):1775-1784. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26633.
9
Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus modified FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer.雷莫芦单抗联合改良 FOLFIRI 方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效和安全性。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;24(5):508-515. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-01391-w. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Prognostic factors for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in real-life practice: the ANICE-PaC study.在真实实践中,使用 nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌的生存预后因素:ANICE-PaC 研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5101-3.