Roach Brynn, Walker Tony R
School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Mar;189(3):109. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5823-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Aquatic monitoring programs are imperative for the functioning of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process and a cornerstone for industrial compliance in Canada. However, in 2012, several leading pieces of federal environmental legislation (e.g., Canadian Environmental Assessment Act c.19, s. 52, 2012) were drastically altered, effectively weakening levels of environmental protection for aquatic ecosystems during project developments. This paper assesses the impact of CEAA 2012 on aquatic monitoring programs (and subsequent monitoring data reporting) across Canada for ten projects (five completed pre-CEAA 2012 and five completed post-CEAA 2012). Projects included four energy and six mining projects and were selected based on the following criteria: (i) representative of Canada's resource economy; (ii) project information was publicly available; and (iii) strong public interest. Projects pre- and post-CEAA 2012 exhibited few apparent differences before and after environmental regulatory changes. However, wide discrepancies exist in numbers and types of parameters reported, along with a lack of consistency in reporting. Projects pre-CEAA 2012 provided more follow-up monitoring commitments. Although qualitative differences remain inconclusive, this paper highlights requirements for further assessment of aquatic monitoring and follow-up programs in Canada. Recommendations for the government to consider during reviews of the federal environmental assessment processes include (i) improved transparency on the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency website ( https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/ ); (ii) creation of a legally binding standardized aquatic monitoring program framework to ensure that all Canadian aquatic ecosystems are monitored with equal rigour; and (iii) commitments and justification related to frequency of aquatic monitoring of water quality.
水生生物监测计划对于环境影响评估(EIA)过程的运作至关重要,也是加拿大工业合规的基石。然而,2012年,几项主要的联邦环境立法(如《加拿大环境评估法》c.19,s. 52,2012)被大幅修改,实际上削弱了项目开发过程中对水生生态系统的环境保护水平。本文评估了2012年《加拿大环境评估法》(CEAA 2012)对加拿大十个项目(五个在CEAA 2012之前完成,五个在CEAA 2012之后完成)的水生生物监测计划(以及随后的监测数据报告)的影响。这些项目包括四个能源项目和六个采矿项目,其选择基于以下标准:(i)代表加拿大的资源经济;(ii)项目信息公开可得;(iii)公众关注度高。CEAA 2012前后的项目在环境监管变化前后几乎没有明显差异。然而,报告的参数数量和类型存在很大差异,报告也缺乏一致性。CEAA 2012之前的项目提供了更多的后续监测承诺。尽管定性差异尚无定论,但本文强调了进一步评估加拿大水生生物监测和后续计划的必要性。政府在审查联邦环境评估过程时应考虑的建议包括:(i)提高加拿大环境评估局网站(https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/)的透明度;(ii)创建具有法律约束力的标准化水生生物监测计划框架,以确保对加拿大所有水生生态系统进行同等严格的监测;(iii)与水质水生生物监测频率相关的承诺和理由。