• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视频监测褐飞虱在水稻上的捕食行为显示了哨兵方法的缺陷。

Video monitoring of brown planthopper predation in rice shows flaws of sentinel methods.

机构信息

Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Science, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 17;7:42210. doi: 10.1038/srep42210.

DOI:10.1038/srep42210
PMID:28211500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5314450/
Abstract

Immobilized preys are routinely used in agro-ecological exposure studies to quantify predation of pests under field conditions, but this method has not been validated. Our purpose was to determine the validity of using immobilized adults of the major rice pest Nilaparvata lugens, brown plant hopper (BPH), as sentinels. We used direct observation by video recording to determine the causal agents of removal of field exposed BPH sentinels with two experiments: 1) we recorded removal events of dead, immobilized BPH; and 2) we compared removal of (i) dead, immobilized BPH, (ii) live, immobilized BPH, and (iii) live, mobile BPH. Long-horned grasshoppers were responsible for most removals of dead, immobilized BPH, in both experiments. Predatory ground beetles removed most of the live, immobilized BPH, whereas frogs were the major predators of live, mobile BPH. Overall, we showed that removal of immobilized sentinel prey is not representative for predation of live, mobile prey, stressing the need for a critical assessment of commonly used sentinel methods. In addition, we found that frogs played the major role in predation of BPH in rice. As current strategies to enhance biocontrol of planthoppers in rice focus on arthropod natural enemies, this finding could have major implications.

摘要

固定的猎物通常用于农业生态暴露研究中,以量化田间条件下害虫的捕食情况,但这种方法尚未得到验证。我们的目的是确定使用固定的主要水稻害虫褐飞虱成虫作为哨兵的有效性。我们使用视频记录进行直接观察,通过两个实验来确定田间暴露的褐飞虱哨兵被移除的原因:1)我们记录了死亡、固定的褐飞虱的移除事件;2)我们比较了(i)死亡、固定的褐飞虱,(ii)存活、固定的褐飞虱和(iii)存活、移动的褐飞虱的移除情况。在这两个实验中,长角蚱蜢是导致大多数死亡、固定的褐飞虱被移除的主要原因。捕食性步甲甲虫移除了大多数存活、固定的褐飞虱,而青蛙则是移动的、存活的褐飞虱的主要捕食者。总的来说,我们表明,固定的哨兵猎物的移除不能代表对移动的、存活的猎物的捕食,这强调了对常用哨兵方法进行批判性评估的必要性。此外,我们发现青蛙在水稻褐飞虱的捕食中起着主要作用。由于目前增强水稻中对稻飞虱的生物防治的策略侧重于节肢动物的天敌,这一发现可能具有重大意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/23fe36d08b30/srep42210-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/7eb8f03ea36c/srep42210-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/52d8a8e322e4/srep42210-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/1d3d99afd67b/srep42210-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/5a16ecf8d2df/srep42210-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/23fe36d08b30/srep42210-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/7eb8f03ea36c/srep42210-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/52d8a8e322e4/srep42210-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/1d3d99afd67b/srep42210-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/5a16ecf8d2df/srep42210-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2997/5314450/23fe36d08b30/srep42210-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Video monitoring of brown planthopper predation in rice shows flaws of sentinel methods.视频监测褐飞虱在水稻上的捕食行为显示了哨兵方法的缺陷。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 17;7:42210. doi: 10.1038/srep42210.
2
Early season natural control of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens: the contribution and interaction of two spider species and a predatory bug.褐飞虱Nilaparvata lugens的早期自然控制:两种蜘蛛物种和一种捕食性蝽象的作用及相互作用
Bull Entomol Res. 2007 Oct;97(5):533-44. doi: 10.1017/S0007485307005196.
3
Mechanisms of callose deposition in rice regulated by exogenous abscisic acid and its involvement in rice resistance to Nilaparvata lugens Stål (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).外源脱落酸调控水稻胼胝质沉积的机制及其在水稻抗褐飞虱Nilaparvata lugens Stål(半翅目:飞虱科)中的作用。
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Dec;73(12):2559-2568. doi: 10.1002/ps.4655. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Cry2A rice did not affect the interspecific interactions between two rice planthoppers, , and .转 Cry2A 水稻并不影响两种稻飞虱, 和 的种间相互作用。
GM Crops Food. 2019;10(3):170-180. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2019.1649530. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Development and preliminary application of a triplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for evaluating predation on three planthoppers in a rice ecosystem.三重实时聚合酶链反应检测法的开发与初步应用,用于评估稻田生态系统中三种飞虱的捕食情况。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Sep;13(5):811-9. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12127. Epub 2013 May 27.
6
Ecological engineering in low land rice for brown plant hopper, (Stål) management.稻田生态工程治理褐飞虱(Stål)
PeerJ. 2023 Sep 27;11:e15531. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15531. eCollection 2023.
7
A Salivary Endo-β-1,4-Glucanase Acts as an Effector That Enables the Brown Planthopper to Feed on Rice.一种唾液内切-β-1,4-葡聚糖酶作为一种效应因子,使褐飞虱能够取食水稻。
Plant Physiol. 2017 Mar;173(3):1920-1932. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01493. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
Gene expression and plant hormone levels in two contrasting rice genotypes responding to brown planthopper infestation.两种对褐飞虱侵害反应不同的水稻基因型中的基因表达和植物激素水平
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1005-7.
9
Influence of rice black streaked dwarf virus on the ecological fitness of non-vector planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).水稻黑条矮缩病毒对非媒介褐飞虱 Nilaparvata lugens(半翅目:飞虱科)生态适应性的影响。
Insect Sci. 2014 Aug;21(4):507-14. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12045. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
A salivary EF-hand calcium-binding protein of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens functions as an effector for defense responses in rice.褐飞虱Nilaparvata lugens 的一种唾液 EF 手钙结合蛋白作为水稻防御反应的效应因子。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 18;7:40498. doi: 10.1038/srep40498.

引用本文的文献

1
Caught on camera: Field imagery reveals the unexpected importance of vertebrates for biological control of the banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus Col. Curculionidae).镜头捕捉:实地图像显示脊椎动物在控制香蕉象甲(Cosmopolites sordidus Col. Curculionidae)方面具有出人意料的重要性。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 20;17(9):e0274223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274223. eCollection 2022.
2
Influence of the Color, Shape, and Size of the Clay Model on Arthropod Interactions in Turfgrass.土壤模型的颜色、形状和大小对草坪中节肢动物相互作用的影响。
J Insect Sci. 2021 Sep 1;21(5). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieab070.
3
An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems.

本文引用的文献

1
Modification and Application of a Leaf Blower-vac for Field Sampling of Arthropods.用于节肢动物野外采样的吹吸式叶吹风机的改进与应用
J Vis Exp. 2016 Aug 10(114):54655. doi: 10.3791/54655.
2
Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes.在埃塞俄比亚的家庭菜园中,节肢动物而非鸟类的捕食现象在树木稀少的景观中比在树木繁茂的景观中更为频繁。
PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126639. eCollection 2015.
3
Assessing the impact of arthropod natural enemies on crop pests at the field scale.
全球综合评估(WIA)系统杀虫剂更新。第 4 部分:主要作物系统中的替代品。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(24):29867-29899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09279-x. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
评估节肢动物天敌对田间尺度下作物害虫的影响。
Insect Sci. 2015 Feb;22(1):20-34. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12174. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
4
Comparison of generalist predators in winter-flooded and conventionally managed rice paddies and identification of their limiting factors.冬季淹水和传统管理稻田中多食性捕食者的比较及其限制因素的识别。
Springerplus. 2014 Aug 9;3:418. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-418. eCollection 2014.
5
Conservation biological control and pest performance in lawn turf: does mowing height matter?草坪草皮中的保护生物防治与害虫表现:修剪高度有影响吗?
Environ Manage. 2014 Mar;53(3):648-59. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0226-2. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
6
Pest-suppression potential of midwestern landscapes under contrasting bioenergy scenarios.中西部景观在不同生物能源情景下的害虫抑制潜力。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041728. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Sublethal effects and predator-prey interactions: implications for ecological risk assessment.亚致死效应与捕食者-猎物相互作用:对生态风险评估的启示。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Nov;28(11):2449-57. doi: 10.1897/09-108.1.