• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗延误与口服降糖药物强化治疗及血糖控制不佳患者微血管和大血管事件风险:一项个体患者模拟研究。

Delays in treatment intensification with oral antidiabetic drugs and risk of microvascular and macrovascular events in patients with poor glycaemic control: An individual patient simulation study.

机构信息

Evidera, San Francisco, California.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jul;19(7):1006-1013. doi: 10.1111/dom.12913. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1111/dom.12913
PMID:28211604
Abstract

AIMS

To use the Archimedes model to estimate the consequences of delays in oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) treatment intensification on glycaemic control and long-term outcomes at 5 and 20 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using real-world data, we modelled a cohort of hypothetical patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥8%, on metformin, with no history of insulin use. The cohort included 3 strata based on the number of OADs taken at baseline. The first add-on in the intensification sequence was a sulphonylurea, next was a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and last, a thiazolidinedione. The scenarios included either no delay or delay, based on observed and extrapolated times to intensification.

RESULTS

At 1 year, HbA1c was 6.8% for patients intensifying without delay, and 8.2% for those delaying intensification. For no delay vs delay, risks of major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, heart failure and amputations were reduced by 18.0%, 25.0%, 13.7%, and 20.4%, respectively, at 5 years; severe hypoglycaemia risk, however, increased to 19% for the no delay scenario vs 12.5% for delay. At 20 years, the results showed similar trends to those at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Timing of intensification of OAD therapy according to guideline recommendations led to greater reductions in HbA1c and lower risks of complications, but higher risks of hypoglycaemia than delaying intensification. These results highlight the potential impact of timely treatment intensification on long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

使用阿基米德模型估算口服降糖药(OAD)强化治疗延迟对血糖控制和 5 年及 20 年长期结局的影响。

材料和方法

使用真实世界数据,我们对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥8%、服用二甲双胍且无胰岛素使用史的假设患者队列进行建模。该队列根据基线时服用的 OAD 数量分为 3 个亚组。强化治疗序列中的第一种添加药物为磺脲类,其次是二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂,最后是噻唑烷二酮类。根据观察到的和推断的强化时间,情景包括无延迟或延迟。

结果

在无延迟强化的患者中,1 年后 HbA1c 为 6.8%,而延迟强化的患者为 8.2%。与延迟强化相比,无延迟强化的主要不良心脏事件、心肌梗死、心力衰竭和截肢风险分别降低了 18.0%、25.0%、13.7%和 20.4%,分别为 5 年;然而,无延迟强化的严重低血糖风险增加至 19%,而延迟强化的严重低血糖风险为 12.5%。20 年后,结果显示出与 5 年相似的趋势。

结论

根据指南建议调整 OAD 治疗强化的时机可使 HbA1c 降低更多,并发症风险降低,但低血糖风险升高,高于延迟强化。这些结果强调了及时治疗强化对长期结局的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Delays in treatment intensification with oral antidiabetic drugs and risk of microvascular and macrovascular events in patients with poor glycaemic control: An individual patient simulation study.治疗延误与口服降糖药物强化治疗及血糖控制不佳患者微血管和大血管事件风险:一项个体患者模拟研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jul;19(7):1006-1013. doi: 10.1111/dom.12913. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Relationship of glycated haemoglobin and reported hypoglycaemia to cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome events: The EXAMINE trial.2型糖尿病合并近期急性冠脉综合征事件患者糖化血红蛋白及报告的低血糖与心血管结局的关系:EXAMINE试验
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 May;19(5):664-671. doi: 10.1111/dom.12871. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Safety and efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial.每周一次司美格鲁肽对比其他口服降糖药用于治疗日本 2 型糖尿病血糖控制不佳患者的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1202-1212. doi: 10.1111/dom.13218. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Glycaemic outcomes of an Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER vulnerable patIents: A randomized, controlled stUdy in type 2 diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM).个体化治疗方案对老年脆弱患者血糖控制的效果:一项 2 型糖尿病的随机对照研究(IMPERIUM)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):148-156. doi: 10.1111/dom.13051. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
The evaluation of clinical and cost outcomes associated with earlier initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.评估 2 型糖尿病患者更早起始胰岛素治疗的临床和成本结局。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):968-84. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.968.
6
Comparative review of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas.二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂与磺脲类药物的比较综述
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):333-47. doi: 10.1111/dom.12610. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
7
Patterns of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating second-line therapy after metformin monotherapy: Retrospective data for 10 256 individuals from the United Kingdom and Germany.二甲双胍单药治疗后起始二线治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制模式:来自英国和德国的 10256 个人的回顾性数据。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):389-399. doi: 10.1111/dom.13083. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus.口服抗糖尿病药物:在2型糖尿病中的当前作用
Drugs. 2005;65(3):385-411. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565030-00005.
9
Therapeutic inertia in patients treated with two or more antidiabetics in primary care: Factors predicting intensification of treatment.在初级保健中接受两种或多种抗糖尿病药物治疗的患者中的治疗惰性:预测治疗强化的因素。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):103-112. doi: 10.1111/dom.13045. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of Linagliptin as an Add-On to Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Comprehensive Post Hoc Analysis.利拉鲁肽与胰岛素联用治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和心血管安全性:一项汇总综合事后分析。
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Feb;40(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to tooth loss and dentures among patients with dental arch deficiencies.牙弓缺损患者对牙齿缺失和义齿的知识、态度和实践。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1810. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19310-2.
2
Time to Treatment Intensification to Reduce Diabetes-Related Complications: A Post Hoc Study.强化治疗以降低糖尿病相关并发症的时机:一项事后分析研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 1;10(9):1673. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091673.
3
Effect of Clinical Inertia on Diabetes Complications among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
临床惰性对 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病并发症的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 31;58(1):63. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010063.
4
Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA.美国的糖尿病护理质量。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jun 3;23(7):73. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01503-5.
5
Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Poor Glycemic Control Associated with Therapeutic Inertia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.评估美国 2 型糖尿病患者因治疗惰性导致的血糖控制不佳的临床和经济负担。
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01199-8. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Clinical Inertia in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Obesity: An Observational Retrospective Study.肥胖的2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的临床惰性:一项观察性回顾性研究
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Feb;11(2):437-451. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00745-5. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
7
Treatment patterns of drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital database.初治2型糖尿病患者的治疗模式:一项使用日本医院数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019 Nov 1;11:90. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0486-y. eCollection 2019.
8
Assessment of the relationship between diabetes treatment intensification and quality measure performance using electronic medical records.使用电子病历评估糖尿病治疗强化与质量指标表现之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 12;13(6):e0199011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199011. eCollection 2018.
9
Diabetes and dyslipidemia: characterizing lipoprotein metabolism.糖尿病与血脂异常:脂蛋白代谢特征
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017 Jul 28;10:333-343. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S115855. eCollection 2017.