Cohen Romain, Cervera Pascale, Svrcek Magali, Pellat Anna, Dreyer Chantal, de Gramont Aimery, André Thierry
Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Department of Pathology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0453-5.
The BRAF activating mutation, harbored by approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), confers dramatic prognosis to advanced diseases. In early-stage setting, the identification of the BRAF mutation does not impact the therapeutic decision. Yet, the BRAF mutation could be considered as a stratification factor in adjuvant trials, because of its prognostic impact after relapse. Moreover, both BRAF mutation and mismatch repair (MMR) statuses should be determined in all CRC to help identify sporadic tumors versus Lynch syndrome-related tumors. Indeed, in patients with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors and MLH1 loss of expression, the BRAFV600E mutation indicates a sporadic origin. In advanced BRAF-mutated CRC, the standard of care remains fluoropyrimidine-based cytotoxic regimen in combination with bevacizumab. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that there was insufficient data to justify the exclusion of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, antiangiogenic agents should be preferred in the first-line setting. Despite the lack of a randomized phase 3 study dedicated to BRAF-mutated CRC, chemotherapy intensification combining a quadruple association of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI), and bevacizumab seems like a valid option. Although first results with BRAF inhibitors as single agents in BRAF-mutated CRC were disappointing, their association with therapies targeting the MAPK pathway seems to overcome the primary resistance to BRAF inhibition. In the field of sporadic CRC, the BRAF mutation is strongly associated with MMR deficiency. Considering breakthrough results of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR repair tumors, determination of the MMR status appears to be mandatory. Given the dramatic prognosis conferred by the BRAF mutation, patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC need to be systematically identified and proposed for clinical trial enrolment in order to benefit from innovative therapies.
约10%的结直肠癌(CRC)存在BRAF激活突变,这会使晚期疾病的预后显著变差。在早期阶段,BRAF突变的识别并不影响治疗决策。然而,由于BRAF突变对复发后的预后有影响,在辅助试验中可将其视为分层因素。此外,所有CRC都应确定BRAF突变和错配修复(MMR)状态,以帮助鉴别散发性肿瘤与林奇综合征相关肿瘤。实际上,在MMR缺陷(dMMR)肿瘤且MLH1表达缺失的患者中,BRAFV600E突变表明肿瘤起源于散发性。在晚期BRAF突变型CRC中,标准治疗方案仍是基于氟嘧啶的细胞毒性方案联合贝伐单抗。尽管最近的一项荟萃分析表明,没有足够的数据证明排除抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单克隆抗体是合理的,但在一线治疗中应首选抗血管生成药物。尽管缺乏专门针对BRAF突变型CRC的随机3期研究,但化疗强化方案联合5-氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂、伊立替康(FOLFOXIRI)和贝伐单抗四联疗法似乎是一个有效的选择。尽管BRAF抑制剂单药治疗BRAF突变型CRC的初步结果令人失望,但它们与靶向丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)通路的疗法联合使用似乎能克服对BRAF抑制的原发性耐药。在散发性CRC领域,BRAF突变与MMR缺陷密切相关。鉴于免疫检查点抑制剂在dMMR修复肿瘤中取得的突破性成果,确定MMR状态似乎是必不可少的。鉴于BRAF突变导致的预后极差,需要系统地识别BRAF突变的晚期CRC患者,并建议他们参加临床试验,以便从创新疗法中获益。