Cohen Randy, Bavishi Chirag, Haider Syed, Thankachen Jincy, Rozanski Alan
Crystal Run Healthcare, Cardiology Division, West Nyack, New York.
Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital Center, Mount Sinai Heart and the Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital Center, Mount Sinai Heart and the Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 15;119(8):1211-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
To assess the net impact of vital exhaustion on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and PsychINFO (through April 2016) to identify all studies which investigated the relation between vital exhaustion (VE) and health outcomes. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a cohort study (prospective cohort or historical cohort) consisting of adults (>18 years); (2) at least 1 self-reported or interview-based assessment of VE or exhaustion; (3) evaluated the association between vital exhaustion or exhaustion and relevant outcomes; and (4) reported adjusted risk estimates of vital exhaustion/exhaustion for outcomes. Maximally adjusted effect estimates with 95% CIs along with variables used for adjustment in multivariate analysis were also abstracted. Primary study outcome was cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were stroke and all-cause mortality. Seventeen studies (19 comparisons) with a total of 107,175 participants were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 6 years. VE was significantly associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events (relative risk 1.53, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.83, p <0.001) and all-cause mortality (relative risk 1.48, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.72, p <0.001). VE also showed a trend for increased incident stroke (relative risk 1.46, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.21, p = 0.07). Subgroup analyses yielded similar results. VE is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular events, comparable in potency to common psychosocial risk factors. Our results imply a need to more closely study VE, and potentially related states of exhaustion, such as occupational burnout.
为评估精力耗竭对心血管事件和全因死亡率的净影响,我们对PubMed、EMBASE和PsychINFO(截至2016年4月)进行了系统检索,以识别所有调查精力耗竭(VE)与健康结局之间关系的研究。纳入标准如下:(1)一项由成年人(>18岁)组成的队列研究(前瞻性队列或历史性队列);(2)至少1次基于自我报告或访谈的VE或耗竭评估;(3)评估精力耗竭或耗竭与相关结局之间的关联;(4)报告精力耗竭/耗竭对结局的调整后风险估计值。还提取了具有95%置信区间的最大调整效应估计值以及多变量分析中用于调整的变量。主要研究结局是心血管事件。次要结局是中风和全因死亡率。分析纳入了17项研究(19项比较),共有107175名参与者。平均随访时间为6年。VE与心血管事件风险增加显著相关(相对风险1.53,95%置信区间1.28至1.83,p<0.001)和全因死亡率(相对风险1.48,95%置信区间1.28至1.72,p<0.001)。VE在中风发生率增加方面也显示出一种趋势(相对风险1.46,95%置信区间0.97至2.21,p = 0.07)。亚组分析得出了类似结果。VE是心血管事件的一个重要危险因素,其效力与常见的心理社会危险因素相当。我们的结果意味着需要更密切地研究VE以及可能与之相关的耗竭状态,如职业倦怠。