• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与人类不同,鸽子在类似老虎机的任务中不喜欢接近成功。

Pigeons, unlike humans, do not prefer near hits in a slot-machine-like task.

作者信息

Fortes Inês, Case Jacob P, Zentall Thomas R

机构信息

University of Minho, Portugal.

University of Kentucky, United States.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2017 May;138:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.012
PMID:28216121
Abstract

Slot machines are among the most popular forms of commercial gambling, and the high frequency of losses that come close to winning - near hits - in this game appears to contribute to its popularity. In the present experiment we tested if pigeons, similarly to humans, prefer an alternative that provides near-hit outcomes in a slot-machine-like task. The pigeons received series of three stimuli, one every two seconds: if the three stimuli matched, food was delivered (a win); if they did not match, food was not delivered (a loss). We gave pigeons a choice between two options that provided food with the same probability but they differed in the sequence of stimuli on loss trials. For the near-hit alternative the non-matching stimulus was the third one (defined as a near hit). For the clear-loss alternative the non-matching stimulus was the second one. We found that the pigeons preferred the clear-loss alternative, that is, they preferred to be given information about the outcome sooner. This result is consistent with prior research on suboptimal choice with pigeons that emphasizes the role of information in choice but is inconsistent with the results of research with humans.

摘要

老虎机是最受欢迎的商业赌博形式之一,在这个游戏中,接近获胜的高频损失——即“差点中彩”——似乎促成了它的流行。在本实验中,我们测试了鸽子是否与人类一样,在类似老虎机的任务中更喜欢提供差点中彩结果的选项。鸽子每两秒会收到一系列三个刺激:如果这三个刺激匹配,就会提供食物(获胜);如果不匹配,就不提供食物(失败)。我们让鸽子在两个选项之间做出选择,这两个选项提供食物的概率相同,但在失败试验中的刺激顺序不同。对于差点中彩的选项,不匹配的刺激是第三个(定义为差点中彩)。对于明显失败的选项,不匹配的刺激是第二个。我们发现鸽子更喜欢明显失败的选项,也就是说,它们更喜欢更快得到结果信息。这一结果与之前关于鸽子次优选择的研究一致,该研究强调了信息在选择中的作用,但与人类的研究结果不一致。

相似文献

1
Pigeons, unlike humans, do not prefer near hits in a slot-machine-like task.与人类不同,鸽子在类似老虎机的任务中不喜欢接近成功。
Behav Processes. 2017 May;138:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
2
Do pigeons prefer alternatives that include near-hit outcomes?鸽子更喜欢包含接近成功结果的选择吗?
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(3):247-54. doi: 10.1037/xan0000069.
3
Rats' optimal choice behavior in a gambling-like task.大鼠在类似赌博任务中的最优选择行为。
Behav Processes. 2019 May;162:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
4
Prior commitment: Its effect on suboptimal choice in a gambling-like task.先前承诺:其对类似赌博任务中次优选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2017 Dec;145:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
5
Impulsivity affects suboptimal gambling-like choice by pigeons.冲动性影响鸽子做出次优的类似赌博的选择。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):2-11. doi: 10.1037/xan0000001.
6
Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.鸽子偏好辨别性刺激,而与强化的总体概率以及条件性强化物的呈现次数无关。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Oct;38(4):446-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030321.
7
Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.人类和鸽子的次优选择。
Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):334-343. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00391-8.
8
Hungry pigeons make suboptimal choices, less hungry pigeons do not.饥饿的鸽子做出次优选择,不那么饥饿的鸽子则不会。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):884-91. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0282-2.
9
Maladaptive choice behaviour by pigeons: an animal analogue and possible mechanism for gambling (sub-optimal human decision-making behaviour).鸽子的适应不良选择行为:一种动物模拟以及赌博(次优人类决策行为)的可能机制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 22;278(1709):1203-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1607. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
10
Effects of winning cues and relative payout on choice between simulated slot machines.赢得线索和相对收益对模拟老虎机选择的影响。
Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1719-1727. doi: 10.1111/add.15010. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisited: Pigeons Have Much Cognitive Behavior in Common With Humans.再探:鸽子与人类有许多共同的认知行为。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 21;11:618636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.618636. eCollection 2020.
2
The Near-Miss Effect in Slot Machines: A Review and Experimental Analysis Over Half a Century Later.近失效应在老虎机中的应用:半个多世纪后的回顾与实验分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):611-632. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09891-8.