Ayele Teshale, Jarso Habtemu, Mamo Girma
Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-aman, Ethiopia.
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Open AIDS J. 2017 Jan 23;11:1-11. doi: 10.2174/1874613601711010001. eCollection 2017.
Tenofovir (TDF) based regimen is one of the first line agents that has been utilized routinely since 2013 in Ethiopia. Unfortunately, there is limited information regarding the Clinical outcomes and associated risk factors in this setting, where patients generally present late, have high rates of TB and other infectious conditions.
A two year retrospective cohort study was conducted from February 10/2015 to March 10/2015 at Jimma University Specialized Hospital. A total of 280 records were reviewed by including data from September 3, 2012 to July 31, 2014. Records were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data was collected on socio-demographic, clinical and drug related variables. Data was analyzed using STATA 13.1. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to compare survival experience and identify independent predictors. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted to elucidate the average treatment effects of each regimen over opportunistic infections.
Of 280 patients, 183(65.36%) were females and 93(33.32%) of females belong to Tenofovir group. Through 24 months analysis, TDF based regimen had a protective effect against death and opportunistic infections (OIs), (AHR=0.79, 95% CI [0.24, 2.62]) and (AHR=0.78, 95%CI [0.43, 1.4] respectively. The average treatment effect of TDF/3TC/EFV was (-71/1000, p=0.026), while it was (+114/1000, ) for AZT/3TC/EFV. However, TDF/3TC/NVP was associated with statistically insignificant morbidity reduction (-74/1000, ). Those with body mass-index (BMI) <18.5kg/m2 (AHR=3.21, 95%CI [0.93, 11.97]) had higher hazard of death. Absence of baseline prophylaxis (AHR=8.22, 95% CI [1.7, 39.77]), Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis alone (AHR=6.15, 95% CI [1.47, 26.67]) and BMI<18.5kg/m2 (AHR=2.06, 95% CI [1.14, 3.73]) had higher hazards of OIs.
The survival benefit of TDF based regimen was similar to AZT based regimen and therefore can be used as an alternative for HIV/AIDS patients in resource limited setups. However, since this study was not dealt with toxicity of the regimens, we recommend to conduct high quality design on this issue.
自2013年以来,基于替诺福韦(TDF)的治疗方案一直是埃塞俄比亚常规使用的一线治疗药物之一。遗憾的是,在患者普遍就诊较晚、结核病和其他感染性疾病发病率较高的这种情况下,关于临床结局和相关危险因素的信息有限。
于2015年2月10日至2015年3月10日在吉姆马大学专科医院进行了一项为期两年的回顾性队列研究。共审查了280份记录,纳入了2012年9月3日至2014年7月31日的数据。使用简单随机抽样技术选择记录。收集了社会人口统计学、临床和药物相关变量的数据。使用STATA 13.1进行数据分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归来比较生存经验并确定独立预测因素。进行倾向评分匹配分析以阐明每种治疗方案对机会性感染的平均治疗效果。
280例患者中,183例(65.36%)为女性,其中93例(33.32%)女性属于替诺福韦组。经过24个月的分析,基于TDF的治疗方案对死亡和机会性感染(OIs)具有保护作用,(调整后风险比[AHR]=0.79,95%置信区间[CI][0.24,2.62])和(AHR=0.78,95%CI[0.43,1.4])。TDF/3TC/EFV的平均治疗效果为(-71/1000,p=0.026),而AZT/3TC/EFV为(+114/1000)。然而,TDF/3TC/NVP与发病率降低无统计学意义相关(-74/1000)。体重指数(BMI)<18.5kg/m2的患者(AHR=3.21,95%CI[0.93,11.97])死亡风险更高。缺乏基线预防措施(AHR=8.22,95%CI[1.7,39.77])、仅使用复方新诺明预防(AHR=6.15,95%CI[1.47,26.67])以及BMI<18.5kg/m2(AHR=2.06,95%CI[1.14,3.73])的患者发生机会性感染的风险更高。
基于TDF的治疗方案的生存获益与基于齐多夫定(AZT)的治疗方案相似,因此可作为资源有限环境下HIV/AIDS患者的替代方案。然而,由于本研究未涉及这些治疗方案的毒性,我们建议针对此问题进行高质量设计。