Kalra Sanjay, Sahay Rakesh
Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Department of Endocrinology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):245-248. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.194341.
Recently reported cardiovascular outcome studies on empagliflozin (EMPA-REG) and liraglutide (LEADER) have spurred interest in this field of diabetology. This commentary compares and contrasts these studies with two equally important outcome trials conducted using blood pressure lowering agents. A comparison with MICROHOPE (using ramipril) and ADVANCE (using perindopril + indapamide) blood pressure arms throws up interesting facts. The degree of blood pressure lowering, dissociation between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular benefits, and discordance between renal and retinal outcomes are surprisingly similar in these trials, conducted using disparate molecules. The time taken to achieve such benefits is similar for all drugs except empagliflozin. Such discussion helps inform rational and evidence-based choice of therapy and forms the framework for future research.
最近报道的关于恩格列净(EMPA-REG)和利拉鲁肽(LEADER)的心血管结局研究激发了糖尿病学领域的兴趣。本评论将这些研究与另外两项使用降压药物进行的同样重要的结局试验进行了比较和对比。与使用雷米普利的MICROHOPE试验以及使用培哚普利+吲达帕胺的ADVANCE试验的血压治疗组进行比较,得出了一些有趣的事实。在这些使用不同药物分子进行的试验中,血压降低程度、心血管和脑血管益处之间的差异以及肾脏和视网膜结局之间的不一致性惊人地相似。除恩格列净外,所有药物实现这些益处所需的时间相似。这样的讨论有助于为合理且基于证据的治疗选择提供依据,并构成未来研究的框架。