Milton-Laskibar I, Aguirre L, Macarulla M T, Etxeberria U, Milagro F I, Martínez J A, Contreras J, Portillo M P
Nutrition and Obesity Group, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Lucio Lascaray Research Institute, Vitoria, Spain.
CIBERobn Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition, Institute of Health Carlos III, Spain.
Biofactors. 2017 May 6;43(3):371-378. doi: 10.1002/biof.1347. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
Resveratrol (RSV) has been proposed as an energy restriction mimetic. This study aimed to compare the effects of RSV and energy restriction on insulin resistance induced by an obesogenic diet. Any additive effect of both treatments was also analyzed. Rats were fed a high-fat high-sucrose diet for 6 weeks. They were then distributed in four experimental groups which were either fed a standard control diet (C), or treated with RSV (30 mg/kg/d), or submitted to energy restriction (R, 15%), or treated with RSV and submitted to energy restriction (RR). A glucose tolerance test was performed, and serum glucose, insulin, fructosamine, adiponectin, and leptin concentrations determined. Muscle triacylglycerol content and protein expression of insulin receptor (IRβ), protein kinase B (Akt), Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160) and glucose transporter 4 (GLUT-4) were measured. In RSV rats, fructosamine concentrations were reduced, HOMA-IR remained unchanged, but glucose tolerance was improved, without changes in phosphorylation of IRβ, Akt, and AS160 or in GLUT-4 protein expression. Rats under energy restriction showed an improvement in all the markers related to glycemic control, as well as increased phosphorylation of AS160 and protein expression of GLUT-4. In rats from RR group the results were similar to R group, with the exception of IRβ and Akt phosphorylation, which were increased. In conclusion, mild energy restriction is more efficient than intake of RSV within a standard balanced diet, and acts by means of a different mechanism from that of RSV. No additive effects between RSV and energy restriction were observed. © 2017 BioFactors, 43(3):371-378, 2017.
白藜芦醇(RSV)被认为是一种模拟能量限制的物质。本研究旨在比较RSV和能量限制对致肥饮食诱导的胰岛素抵抗的影响。同时还分析了两种处理的任何相加作用。大鼠喂食高脂高糖饮食6周。然后将它们分为四个实验组,分别喂食标准对照饮食(C),或用RSV处理(30mg/kg/d),或进行能量限制(R,15%),或用RSV处理并进行能量限制(RR)。进行葡萄糖耐量试验,并测定血清葡萄糖、胰岛素、果糖胺、脂联素和瘦素浓度。测量肌肉三酰甘油含量以及胰岛素受体(IRβ)、蛋白激酶B(Akt)、160kDa的Akt底物(AS160)和葡萄糖转运蛋白4(GLUT-4)的蛋白表达。在RSV处理的大鼠中,果糖胺浓度降低,HOMA-IR保持不变,但葡萄糖耐量得到改善,IRβ、Akt和AS160的磷酸化或GLUT-4蛋白表达没有变化。能量限制的大鼠在所有与血糖控制相关的指标上均有改善,同时AS160的磷酸化增加以及GLUT-4的蛋白表达增加。在RR组大鼠中,结果与R组相似,但IRβ和Akt的磷酸化增加。总之,轻度能量限制比在标准均衡饮食中摄入RSV更有效,且其作用机制与RSV不同。未观察到RSV和能量限制之间的相加作用。©2017生物因子,43(3):371 - 378,2017。