• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国食品药品监督管理局发布反对电动粉碎术的建议前后,微创子宫肌瘤切除术的时间趋势。

Temporal trends in minimally invasive myomectomy before and after the US Food and Drug Administration recommendation against electric morcellation.

作者信息

Pereira Nigel, Frankel William C, Hutchinson Anne P, Patel Hency H, Mostisser Cheri, Elias Rony T

机构信息

Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;137(3):295-300. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12128. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12128
PMID:28218964
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the temporal trends in minimally invasive myomectomy at one reproductive medicine center before and after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation against electric morcellation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken of patients undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy between April 1, 2012, and April 30, 2016, at a center in New York. Temporal trends in laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RAM), and laparoscopically assisted myomectomy (LAM), and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes before and after the April 2014 recommendation were compared.

RESULTS

Minimally invasive myomectomy was performed in 73 patients. No difference was noted in the rates of minimally invasive myomectomy 2 years before (35/74 [47.3%]) and after (38/79 [48.1%]) the FDA's recommendation. The ratio of abdominal to minimally invasive myomectomy remained relatively constant before (68/59=1.15) and during the study period (80/73=1.10). There was a significant decrease in LM and RAM and a corresponding rise in LAM immediately after the recommendation (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The rates of minimally invasive myomectomy before and after the FDA's recommendation did not differ, indicating that technical modifications to laparoscopic technique can allow surgeons to offer minimally invasive myomectomy to patients with symptomatic leiomyomas.

摘要

目的

调查在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布反对电动粉碎术的建议前后,某生殖医学中心微创子宫肌瘤切除术的时间趋势。

方法

对2012年4月1日至2016年4月30日在纽约某中心接受微创子宫肌瘤切除术的患者进行回顾性病历审查。比较2014年4月建议前后腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)、机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(RAM)和腹腔镜辅助子宫肌瘤切除术(LAM)的时间趋势,以及术中及术后结果。

结果

73例患者接受了微创子宫肌瘤切除术。FDA建议前两年(35/74 [47.3%])和建议后(38/79 [48.1%])的微创子宫肌瘤切除率无差异。腹部子宫肌瘤切除术与微创子宫肌瘤切除术的比例在研究前(68/59 = 1.15)和研究期间(80/73 = 1.10)保持相对稳定。建议发布后,LM和RAM显著减少,LAM相应增加(P<0.001)。

结论

FDA建议前后的微创子宫肌瘤切除率没有差异,这表明腹腔镜技术的技术改进可以使外科医生为有症状的平滑肌瘤患者提供微创子宫肌瘤切除术。

相似文献

1
Temporal trends in minimally invasive myomectomy before and after the US Food and Drug Administration recommendation against electric morcellation.在美国食品药品监督管理局发布反对电动粉碎术的建议前后,微创子宫肌瘤切除术的时间趋势。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;137(3):295-300. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12128. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.美国食品药品监督管理局的碎宫术警告与微创子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术发生率的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1174-1180. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001111.
3
Laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation: A review of techniques, outcomes, and practice guidelines.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术和粉碎术:技术、结果和实践指南综述。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jan;46:99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
4
Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications.电动粉碎器停用后小切口剖腹术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:伤口并发症发生率
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):946-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 26.
5
Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.美国食品药品监督管理局发布关于动力粉碎术的安全通讯前后的实践模式及术后并发症
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):98.e1-98.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.047. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Racial Disparities in Response to a US Food and Drug Administration Safety Communication Regarding the Use of Power Morcellation for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma.美国食品和药物管理局关于使用电力切除(俗称“粉碎”)治疗子宫肌瘤的安全性通讯引发的种族差异。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):178-185.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
7
What is the Future of Open Intraperitoneal Power-Morcellation of Fibroids?子宫肌瘤开放性腹腔内动力粉碎术的未来走向如何?
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;59(1):73-84. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000166.
8
Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术时碎解技术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):843-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Use of Electric Power Morcellation and Prevalence of Underlying Cancer in Women Who Undergo Myomectomy.电力旋切术的使用与行子宫肌瘤切除术妇女的潜在癌症患病率。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):69-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.206.
10
Change in Surgical Practice for Women With Leiomyomas After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellator Safety Communication.美国食品药品监督管理局发布子宫粉碎器安全警示后子宫肌瘤女性患者手术方式的改变
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):1057-1063. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002309.

引用本文的文献

1
An intrauterine cavity morcellator: A novel approach to high volume uterus morcellation. Ex-vivo study.宫腔组织切碎器:一种大容量子宫组织切碎的新方法。离体研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 17;18(3):e0282149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282149. eCollection 2023.
2
Predictors of Minimally Invasive Myomectomy in the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年国家住院患者样本数据库中微创子宫肌瘤切除术的预测因素。
JSLS. 2021 Oct-Dec;25(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00065.
3
Laparoscopic-assisted myomectomy with uterine artery occlusion at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center: a case series.
在独立门诊手术中心进行的腹腔镜辅助子宫肌瘤切除术联合子宫动脉闭塞:病例系列
Gynecol Surg. 2020;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s10397-020-01075-2. Epub 2020 Jun 16.