Dittmann Clara, Müller-Engelmann Meike, Resick Patricia A, Gutermann Jana, Stangier Ulrich, Priebe Kathlen, Fydrich Thomas, Ludäscher Petra, Herzog Julia, Steil Regina
Goethe University,Department of Clinical Psychology and Intervention,Frankfurt Main,Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Duke University,Durham,North Carolina,USA.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017 Nov;45(6):661-670. doi: 10.1017/S1352465816000679. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
The assessment of therapeutic adherence is essential for accurately interpreting treatment outcomes in psychotherapy research. However, such assessments are often neglected.
To fill this gap, we aimed to develop and test a scale that assessed therapeutic adherence to Cognitive Processing Therapy - Cognitive Only (CPT), which was adapted for a treatment study targeting patients with post-traumatic stress disorder and co-occurring borderline personality symptoms.
Two independent, trained raters assessed 30 randomly selected treatment sessions involving seven therapists and eight patients who were treated in a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
The inter-rater reliability for all items and the total score yielded good to excellent results (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.70 to 1.00). Cronbach's α was .56 for the adherence scale. Regarding content validity, three experts confirmed the relevance and appropriateness of each item.
The adherence rating scale for the adapted version of CPT is a reliable instrument that can be helpful for interpreting treatment effects, analysing possible relationships between therapeutic adherence and treatment outcomes and teaching therapeutic skills.
在心理治疗研究中,评估治疗依从性对于准确解读治疗结果至关重要。然而,此类评估常常被忽视。
为填补这一空白,我们旨在开发并测试一种量表,用于评估对仅认知性认知加工疗法(CPT)的治疗依从性,该疗法针对创伤后应激障碍及共病边缘型人格症状患者进行了适应性调整,用于一项治疗研究。
两名经过培训的独立评估者对多中心随机对照试验中7名治疗师和8名患者的30个随机选取的治疗疗程进行了评估。
所有项目及总分的评估者间信度产生了良好到优异的结果(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.70至1.00)。依从性量表的Cronbach's α为0.56。关于内容效度,三名专家确认了每个项目的相关性和适当性。
CPT改编版的依从性评定量表是一种可靠的工具,有助于解读治疗效果、分析治疗依从性与治疗结果之间的可能关系以及传授治疗技巧。