Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Department für Psychische Gesundheit, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jun 15;13(1):2079873. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2079873. eCollection 2022.
There is no therapeutic competence and adherence scale for grief-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (grief-focused CBT). However, given the growing body of evidence for the efficacy of grief-focused CBT, such a scale is needed both to ensure the internal validity of clinical trials and to facilitate psychotherapy process research.
To develop and undertake a psychometric evaluation of a therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief-focused CBT.
The scale was developed in two steps. (I) Five experts on the treatment of prolonged grief disorder provided feedback on the relevance and appropriateness of the items. The scale was revised to reflect their feedback. The final therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief (TACs-G) consisted of 15 adherence and 16 competence items. (II) Psychometric evaluation of the TACs-G was based on the rating of 48 randomly selected PG-CBT sessions by two independent raters. The videos were recorded in the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT; DRKS00012317.) ICC was used to calculate inter-rater reliability and TACs-G stability over time (re-evaluation of 10 sessions after 12 months).
The five experts confirmed the relevance and appropriateness of the items. Interrater reliability was found to be high for the total adherence and competence scores (ICC = 0.889 and 0.782, respectively) and moderate to excellent for individual items (ICC = 0.509-1.00). The TACs-G stability over time was found to be strong for both adherence (ICC = 0.970) and competence total scores (ICC = 0.965).
The TACs-G for CBT is a reliable instrument that can be used not only to ensure internal validity but is also suited for psychotherapy process studies. Additionally, it provides a valuable database for targeted feedback in training settings.
This is the first study to report on the development and psychometrical evaluation of a grief-focused adherence and competence scale.Although an increasing number of clinical trials do report the efficacy of grief-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy, none of these studies used a standardized adherence and competence scale to control internal validity.In the present study, we introduced a therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief (TACs-G) that can be applied efficiently across different research settings (e.g. manipulation check, dissemination), and report results of good to excellent psychometric properties.The scale itself could prove useful beyond the research setting as it could possibly serve as a basis for feedback in training settings.
目前尚无针对悲伤聚焦认知行为疗法(grief-focused CBT)的治疗依从性和疗效评估量表。然而,鉴于悲伤聚焦认知行为疗法的疗效证据不断增加,因此需要这样一种量表,不仅可以确保临床试验的内部有效性,还可以促进心理治疗过程的研究。
开发并进行针对悲伤聚焦认知行为疗法的治疗依从性和疗效评估量表的心理测量学评估。
该量表分两步开发。(I)五位治疗慢性悲伤障碍的专家对项目的相关性和适当性提供了反馈。根据他们的反馈对量表进行了修订。最终的悲伤聚焦认知行为疗法治疗依从性和疗效评估量表(TACs-G)包含 15 个依从性项目和 16 个疗效项目。(II)通过两位独立评分者对 48 个随机选择的 PG-CBT 治疗视频进行评分,对 TACs-G 的心理测量学评估。这些视频是在一项随机对照试验(RCT;DRKS00012317)中录制的。ICC 用于计算两个评分者之间的组内相关系数(ICC)以评估治疗依从性和疗效的组内信度和量表在时间上的稳定性(12 个月后重新评估 10 次治疗)。
五位专家均确认了项目的相关性和适当性。治疗依从性和疗效总分的组内相关系数均较高(ICC=0.889 和 0.782),而个别项目的组内相关系数为中度至极好(ICC=0.509-1.00)。治疗依从性和疗效总分在时间上的稳定性较强(ICC=0.970 和 0.965)。
TACs-G 是一种可靠的工具,不仅可以确保内部有效性,而且还适合心理治疗过程的研究。此外,它为培训环境中的有针对性的反馈提供了有价值的数据库。
这是第一项报告悲伤聚焦认知行为疗法治疗依从性和疗效评估量表的开发和心理测量学评估的研究。尽管越来越多的临床试验报告了悲伤聚焦认知行为疗法的疗效,但这些研究均未使用标准化的依从性和疗效评估量表来控制内部有效性。在本研究中,我们引入了一种针对悲伤的治疗依从性和疗效评估量表(TACs-G),可以有效地应用于不同的研究环境(例如,操作检查、传播),并报告了良好到极好的心理测量学特性的结果。该量表本身在研究环境之外可能也很有用,因为它可能可以作为培训环境中反馈的基础。