Jaarsveld Saskia, Lachmann Thomas
Center for Cognitive Science, Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, University of Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 6;8:134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00134. eCollection 2017.
This paper discusses the importance of three features of psychometric tests for cognition research: construct definition, problem space, and knowledge domain. Definition of constructs, e.g., intelligence or creativity, forms the theoretical basis for test construction. Problem space, being well or ill-defined, is determined by the cognitive abilities considered to belong to the constructs, e.g., convergent thinking to intelligence, divergent thinking to creativity. Knowledge domain and the possibilities it offers cognition are reflected in test results. We argue that (a) comparing results of tests with different problem spaces is more informative when cognition operates in both tests on an identical knowledge domain, and (b) intertwining of abilities related to both constructs can only be expected in tests developed to instigate such a process. Test features should guarantee that abilities can contribute to self-generated goal-directed processes bringing forth solutions that are both new and applicable. We propose and discuss a test example that was developed to address these issues.
构念定义、问题空间和知识领域。构念的定义,例如智力或创造力,构成了测试构建的理论基础。问题空间定义明确或不明确,由被认为属于这些构念的认知能力决定,例如,聚合思维对应智力,发散思维对应创造力。知识领域及其为认知提供的可能性反映在测试结果中。我们认为:(a) 当认知在相同知识领域的两次测试中发挥作用时,比较具有不同问题空间的测试结果能提供更多信息;(b) 只有在为激发这种过程而开发的测试中,才有望出现与两种构念相关的能力交织的情况。测试特征应确保能力能够促进自我生成的目标导向过程,从而产生既新颖又适用的解决方案。我们提出并讨论了一个为解决这些问题而开发的测试示例。