Lunke Katrin, Meier Beat
Institute of Psychology and Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 28;7:1089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01089. eCollection 2016.
The goal of the present study was to take a new look at the relationship between creativity and cognitive functioning. Based on models that have postulated domain- and sub-domain-structures for different forms of creativity, like scientific, technical or artistic creativity with cognitive functions as important basis, we developed a new questionnaire. The Artistic Creativity Domains Compendium (ACDC) assesses interest, ability and performance in a distinct way for different domains of artistic creativity. We present the data of 270 adults tested with the ACDC, standard tests of divergent and convergent thinking, and tests of cognitive functions. We present fine-grained analyses on the internal and external validity of the ACDC and on the relationships between creativity, working memory, attention, and intelligence. Our results indicate domain-specific associations between creativity and attention as well as working memory. We conclude that the ACDC is a valid instrument to assess artistic creativity and that a fine-grained analysis reveals distinct patterns of relationships between separate domains of creativity and cognition.
本研究的目的是重新审视创造力与认知功能之间的关系。基于已假定不同形式创造力(如科学、技术或艺术创造力)具有领域和子领域结构且以认知功能为重要基础的模型,我们开发了一份新问卷。《艺术创造力领域纲要》(ACDC)以独特方式评估不同艺术创造力领域的兴趣、能力和表现。我们呈现了270名成年人接受ACDC测试、发散性和聚合性思维标准测试以及认知功能测试的数据。我们对ACDC的内部和外部效度以及创造力、工作记忆、注意力和智力之间的关系进行了细致分析。我们的结果表明创造力与注意力以及工作记忆之间存在特定领域的关联。我们得出结论,ACDC是评估艺术创造力的有效工具,并且细致分析揭示了创造力与认知的不同领域之间独特的关系模式。