• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用带工具变量的类斯坦估计器进行心理健康中的剂量反应建模。

Dose-response modeling in mental health using stein-like estimators with instrumental variables.

作者信息

Ginestet Cedric E, Emsley Richard, Landau Sabine

机构信息

Biostatistics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, U.K.

Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2017 May 20;36(11):1696-1714. doi: 10.1002/sim.7265. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1002/sim.7265
PMID:28222485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5434902/
Abstract

A mental health trial is analyzed using a dose-response model, in which the number of sessions attended by the patients is deemed indicative of the dose of psychotherapeutic treatment. Here, the parameter of interest is the difference in causal treatment effects between the subpopulations that take part in different numbers of therapy sessions. For this data set, interactions between random treatment allocation and prognostic baseline variables provide the requisite instrumental variables. While the corresponding two-stage least squares (TSLS) estimator tends to have smaller bias than the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator; the TSLS suffers from larger variance. It is therefore appealing to combine the desirable properties of the OLS and TSLS estimators. Such a trade-off is achieved through an affine combination of these two estimators, using mean squared error as a criterion. This produces the semi-parametric Stein-like (SPSL) estimator as introduced by Judge and Mittelhammer (2004). The SPSL estimator is used in conjunction with multiple imputation with chained equations, to provide an estimator that can exploit all available information. Simulated data are also generated to illustrate the superiority of the SPSL estimator over its OLS and TSLS counterparts. A package entitled SteinIV implementing these methods has been made available through the R platform. © 2017 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

一项心理健康试验使用剂量反应模型进行分析,在该模型中,患者参加的疗程数量被视为心理治疗剂量的指标。这里,感兴趣的参数是参与不同疗程数量的亚人群之间因果治疗效果的差异。对于这个数据集,随机治疗分配与预后基线变量之间的相互作用提供了必要的工具变量。虽然相应的两阶段最小二乘法(TSLS)估计量往往比普通最小二乘法(OLS)估计量有更小的偏差;但TSLS的方差更大。因此,将OLS和TSLS估计量的理想特性结合起来很有吸引力。这种权衡是通过以均方误差为标准对这两个估计量进行仿射组合来实现的。这就产生了Judge和Mittelhammer(2004年)引入的半参数斯坦因类(SPSL)估计量。SPSL估计量与链式方程多重填补法结合使用,以提供一个能够利用所有可用信息的估计量。还生成了模拟数据来说明SPSL估计量相对于OLS和TSLS估计量的优越性。一个名为SteinIV的实现这些方法的软件包已通过R平台提供。© 2017作者。《医学统计学》由John Wiley & Sons Ltd出版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/e74d10ca7b96/SIM-36-1696-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/ba6eeb2a71ce/SIM-36-1696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/7cc6a1e71789/SIM-36-1696-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/7e9052cb7ba0/SIM-36-1696-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/e74d10ca7b96/SIM-36-1696-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/ba6eeb2a71ce/SIM-36-1696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/7cc6a1e71789/SIM-36-1696-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/7e9052cb7ba0/SIM-36-1696-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96a/5434902/e74d10ca7b96/SIM-36-1696-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dose-response modeling in mental health using stein-like estimators with instrumental variables.使用带工具变量的类斯坦估计器进行心理健康中的剂量反应建模。
Stat Med. 2017 May 20;36(11):1696-1714. doi: 10.1002/sim.7265. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
Stein-like estimators for causal mediation analysis in randomized trials.随机试验中因果中介分析的类 Stein 估计量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Apr;29(4):1129-1148. doi: 10.1177/0962280219852388. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
3
A New Mixed Biased Estimator for Ill-Conditioning Challenges in Linear Regression Model With Chemometrics Applications.一种用于化学计量学应用的线性回归模型中病态问题挑战的新型混合有偏估计器。
Anal Sci Adv. 2025 May 10;6(1):e70020. doi: 10.1002/ansa.70020. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Bias testing, bias correction, and confounder selection using an instrumental variable model.使用工具变量模型进行偏差测试、偏差校正和混杂因素选择。
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 20;39(29):4386-4404. doi: 10.1002/sim.8730. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.精神分裂症治疗资源消耗分析中处理偏态分布成本变量方法的比较。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):21-31.
7
Estimating causal effects with hidden confounding using instrumental variables and environments.使用工具变量和环境估计存在隐藏混杂因素时的因果效应。
Electron J Stat. 2023;17(2):2849-2879. doi: 10.1214/23-ejs2160. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
8
Can we make smart choices between OLS and contaminated IV methods?我们能否在 OLS 和受污染的 IV 方法之间做出明智的选择?
Health Econ. 2014 Apr;23(4):462-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.2926. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
9
Underestimation of uncertainties in health utilities derived from mapping algorithms involving health-related quality-of-life measures: statistical explanations and potential remedies.涉及健康相关生活质量测量的映射算法得出的健康效用值中不确定性的低估:统计学解释及潜在补救措施
Med Decis Making. 2014 Oct;34(7):863-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13517750. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
10
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewing methodological approaches to dose-response modelling in complex interventions: insights and perspectives.复杂干预中剂量反应模型的方法学回顾:见解与观点
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 16;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02585-3.
2
Impact of telephone delivered case-management on the effectiveness of collaborative care for depression and anti-depressant use: A systematic review and meta-regression.电话管理对协作式抑郁症治疗及抗抑郁药物使用的效果影响:系统综述和元回归分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 14;14(6):e0217948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217948. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological treatments for early psychosis can be beneficial or harmful, depending on the therapeutic alliance: an instrumental variable analysis.早期精神病的心理治疗可能有益或有害,取决于治疗联盟:一项工具变量分析。
Psychol Med. 2015 Aug;45(11):2365-73. doi: 10.1017/S003329171500032X. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
2
Commentary on "Mediation analysis without sequential ignorability: Using baseline covariates interacted with random assignment as instrumental variables" by Dylan Small.对迪伦·斯莫尔所著《无序列可忽略性的中介分析:使用与随机分配相互作用的基线协变量作为工具变量》的评论
J Stat Res. 2012;46(2):105-111.
3
Effective elements of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis: results of a novel type of subgroup analysis based on principal stratification.
认知行为疗法治疗精神病的有效因素:基于主要分层的新型亚组分析结果。
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):1057-68. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001954. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
4
Mediation and moderation of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.随机对照试验中复杂干预措施治疗效果的中介和调节作用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Jun;19(3):237-70. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105014. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
5
Estimating dose-response effects in psychological treatment trials: the role of instrumental variables.估计心理治疗试验中的剂量-反应效应:工具变量的作用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):191-215. doi: 10.1177/0962280208097243. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
6
Causal mediation analyses with rank preserving models.使用秩保持模型的因果中介分析。
Biometrics. 2007 Sep;63(3):926-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00766.x.
7
Modelling treatment-effect heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions (psychological treatments).复杂干预(心理治疗)随机对照试验中治疗效果异质性的建模
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 20;26(26):4719-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.2891.
8
Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods.从不依从和失访的随机临床试验中估计治疗效果:工具变量法的作用
Stat Methods Med Res. 2005 Aug;14(4):369-95. doi: 10.1191/0962280205sm403oa.
9
Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up.从一项存在不依从和失访情况的随机对照试验中估计心理治疗效果。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;183:323-31. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.4.323.
10
Randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy in early schizophrenia: acute-phase outcomes.早期精神分裂症认知行为疗法的随机对照试验:急性期结果
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2002 Sep;43:s91-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.43.s91.