Kashuk Jeffry L, Peleg Kobi, Glassberg Elon, Givon Adi, Radomislensky Irina, Kluger Yoram
Assia Medical Group, Barzel 20, Tel Aviv, 96303, Israel.
Disaster Medicine Division, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Feb 21;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0360-6.
Although differences of opinion and controversies may arise, lessons learned from military conflicts often translate into improvements in triage, resuscitation strategies, and surgical technique. Our fully integrated national trauma system, providing care for both military and civilian casualties, necessitates close cooperation between all aspects of both sectors. We theorized that lessons learned from two regional conflicts over 8 years, with resultant improved triage, reduced hospital length of stay, and sustained low mortality would aid performance improvement and provide evidence of overall trauma system maturation.
We performed an 8 year, retrospective analysis of the Israeli National Trauma Registry prospective data base for all casualties presenting to level 1 and 2 trauma centers nationwide during an earlier conflict (W1) (7/12/06-8/14/06) and sought to compare results to those of a more recent war(W2), (7/08/14-08/26/14), as well as to compare our results to non-war civilian morbidity and mortality during the same time frame. Of particular interest were: casualty distributions, injuries/ISS, patterns of evacuation/triage, hospital length of stay, and mortality.
Data on 919 war casualties was available for evaluation. Of 490 evacuated during W1, 341 (70%) were transferred to Level 1 centers, compared with 307 (72%) from the 429 casualties in W2. In W2, significantly more severe injuries (ISS ≥16) were evacuated directly to level 1 centers (42, 76% vs. 20, 43% respectively; p = 0.0007). W2 vs. W1 saw a significant increase in evacuations using helicopter (219,51% vs. 180,37%; p < 0.0001) and increase in ISS ≥16: (66; 15.5% vs. 55; 11%, p = 0.057). In W2 vs. W1, less late inter-hospital transfers occurred: (48, 11% vs. 149, 30%, p < 0.0001); and there was a reduction in admission ≥ 7 days (90,22%vs 154,32%, p = 0.0009). These results persisted in logistic regression analyses, when controlling for ISS..Mortality was not significantly changed either overall or for injures with ISS ≥ 16: (1.2%in W1 vs. 1.9% in W2, p = 0.59, 10.9% in W1 vs. 10.6% in W2, p = 1.0, respectively). When compared to civilian related, (non-war) mortality during the same 8 year time frame, overall mortality was unchanged (1.6% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.38), although there was a noteworthy significant decrease in mortality over time for ISS ≥ 16: 12.1 vs. 9.4 (p = 0.012), and a concomitant reduction in late inter-hospital transfers (9.8 vs. 7.5, p < 0.0001).
Despite more severe injuries in the most recent regional conflict, there was increased direct triage via helicopter to level 1 centers, reduced inter-hospital transfers, reduced hospital length of stay, and persistent low mortality. Although further assessment is required, these data suggest that via ongoing cooperation in a culture of improved preparedness, an integrated military/civilian national trauma network has also positively impacted civilian results via reduced mortality in ISS ≥ 16 and reduced late inter-hospital transfers. These findings support continued maturation of the system as a whole.
尽管可能会出现意见分歧和争议,但从军事冲突中吸取的经验教训往往会转化为分诊、复苏策略和手术技术的改进。我们全面整合的国家创伤系统为军事和 civilian 伤员提供护理,这需要两个部门各方面之间的密切合作。我们推测,从 8 年中的两次地区冲突中吸取的经验教训,带来了改进的分诊、缩短的住院时间和持续的低死亡率,这将有助于提高绩效,并为整个创伤系统的成熟提供证据。
我们对以色列国家创伤登记处的前瞻性数据库进行了为期 8 年的回顾性分析,该数据库涵盖了在早期冲突(W1)(2006 年 7 月 12 日至 2006 年 8 月 14 日)期间全国所有一级和二级创伤中心接收的所有伤员,并试图将结果与最近一场战争(W2)(2014 年 7 月 8 日至 2014 年 8 月 26 日)的结果进行比较,同时将我们的结果与同一时间段内非战争 civilian 的发病率和死亡率进行比较。特别感兴趣的是:伤员分布、损伤/损伤严重度评分(ISS)、疏散/分诊模式、住院时间和死亡率。
有 919 名战争伤员的数据可供评估。在 W1 期间疏散的 490 人中,341 人(70%)被转移到一级中心,而在 W2 的 429 名伤员中,这一比例为 307 人(72%)。在 W2 中,更多重伤员(ISS≥16)被直接疏散到一级中心(分别为 42 人,76% 对 20 人,43%;p = 0.0007)。与 W1 相比,W2 使用直升机疏散的人数显著增加(219 人,51% 对 180 人,37%;p < 0.0001),ISS≥16 的人数也增加(66 人;15.5% 对 55 人;11%,p = 0.057)。与 W1 相比,W2 中晚期医院间转运的情况较少(48 人,11% 对 149 人,30%,p < 0.0001);入院≥7 天的情况有所减少(90 人,22% 对 154 人,32%,p = 0.0009)。在控制 ISS 的逻辑回归分析中,这些结果仍然成立。总体死亡率以及 ISS≥16 的损伤的死亡率均无显著变化(W1 中为 1.2%,W