Suppr超能文献

第二次黎巴嫩战争中士兵的受伤模式。

Injury patterns of soldiers in the second Lebanon war.

机构信息

From the Department of Emergency Medicine (D.S.), Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):160-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a9680e.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the second Lebanon war in 2006, the Israeli Defense Forces fought against well-prepared and well-equipped paramilitary forces. The conflict took place near the Israeli border and major Israeli medical centers. Good data records were maintained throughout the campaign, allowing accurate analysis of injury characteristics. This study is an in-depth analysis of injury mechanisms, severity, and anatomic locations.

METHODS

Data regarding all injured soldiers were collected from all care points up to the definitive care hospitals and were cross-referenced. In addition, trauma branch physicians and nurses interviewed medical teams to validate data accuracy. Injuries were analyzed using Injury Severity Score (ISS) (when precise anatomic data were available) and multiple injury patterns scoring for all.

RESULTS

A total of 833 soldiers sustained combat-related injury during the study period, including 119 fatalities (14.3%). Although most soldiers (361) sustained injury only to one Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) region, the average number of regions per soldier was 2.0 but was 1.5 for survivors versus 4.2 for fatalities.

CONCLUSION

Current war injury classifications have limitations that hinder valid comparisons between campaigns and settings. In addition, limitation on full autopsy in war fatalities further hinders data use. To partly compensate for those limitations, we have looked at the correlation between fatality rates and number of involved anatomic regions and found it to be strong. We have also found high fatality rates in some "combined" injuries such as head and chest injuries (71%) or in the abdomen and an extremity (75%). The use of multiinjury patterns analysis may help understand fatality rates and improve the utility of war injury analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level III.

摘要

背景

在 2006 年的第二次黎巴嫩战争中,以色列国防军与装备精良、训练有素的准军事部队交战。冲突发生在以色列边境附近和主要的以色列医疗中心。整个战役中都保持了良好的数据记录,这使得对损伤特征的准确分析成为可能。本研究深入分析了损伤机制、严重程度和解剖部位。

方法

从所有护理点收集了所有受伤士兵的数据,直至确定治疗医院,并进行交叉参考。此外,创伤科医生和护士还采访了医疗团队,以验证数据的准确性。使用损伤严重程度评分(ISS)(当有精确的解剖数据时)和多种损伤模式评分对所有损伤进行分析。

结果

在研究期间,共有 833 名士兵因战斗受伤,其中 119 人死亡(14.3%)。尽管大多数士兵(361 人)仅受一个简明损伤量表(AIS)区域的损伤,但士兵的平均损伤区域数为 2.0,但幸存者为 1.5,而死亡者为 4.2。

结论

目前的战争损伤分类存在局限性,阻碍了不同战役和环境之间的有效比较。此外,在战争死亡中进行全面尸检的限制进一步阻碍了数据的使用。为了部分弥补这些局限性,我们研究了死亡率与涉及解剖区域数量之间的相关性,发现两者之间存在很强的相关性。我们还发现一些“组合”损伤(如头部和胸部损伤(71%)或腹部和四肢损伤(75%))的死亡率很高。使用多损伤模式分析可能有助于理解死亡率并提高战争损伤分析的实用性。

证据水平

流行病学研究,III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验