• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定结直肠癌筛查的临床和遗传指南,作为风险管理的有效路线图。

Designing clinical and genetic guidelines of colorectal cancer screening as an effective roadmap for risk management.

作者信息

Zali Mohammad Reza, Safdari Reza, Maserat Elham, Asadzadeh Aghdaei Hamid

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Allied Medical Sciences School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Dec;9(Suppl1):S53-S61.

PMID:28224029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5310801/
Abstract

AIM

We aimed to present clinical and genetic guidelines of colorectal cancer screening for risk assessment of populations at risk.

BACKGROUND

National guidelines can be used as a guide for choosing the method of screening for each individual. These guidelines facilitate decision making and support the delivery of cancer screening service.

METHODS

In the first step, a comparative study was performed by using secondary data extracted from the literature review. Three countries (Canada, Australia and United States) were selected from 25 countries that are member in the International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN). The second step of study was qualitative survey. The study was based on the grounded theory approach. Study tool was semi-structured interview. Interviewing involves asking questions and getting answers from participants. 22 expert's perspectives about guidelines of colorectal cancer screening were surveyed.

RESULTS

Screening program of selected countries was compared. Countries were surveyed by number of risk groups and subgroups, criteria for risk assessment, beginning age, recommendations, screening approaches and intervals. Australia and United States have three risk groups and Canada has two risk groups. Four risk groups were defined in the national guideline, including high risk, increased risk, average and low risk group. The high risk group comprises of 8 subgroups, increased risk group comprises of 3 subgroups and average risk group contain 4 subgroups. Approved clinical criteria for hereditary syndromes and the roadmap of genetic and pathologic survey were designed.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines and pathways have a vital role in the quality improvement of CRC screening program. National guidelines were refined according to the environmental and genetic criteria of colorectal cancer in Iran. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations by risk groups. National pathways as a risk assessment tool can evaluate and improve the processes and outcomes of cancer screening in practice. One of the suggestions for future research is the designing expert system for real-time decision making during a clinical interaction.

摘要

目的

我们旨在提出结直肠癌筛查的临床和遗传指南,用于对高危人群进行风险评估。

背景

国家指南可作为为每个人选择筛查方法的指导。这些指南有助于决策并支持癌症筛查服务的提供。

方法

第一步,通过使用从文献综述中提取的二手数据进行比较研究。从国际癌症筛查网络(ICSN)的25个成员国中选取了三个国家(加拿大、澳大利亚和美国)。研究的第二步是定性调查。该研究基于扎根理论方法。研究工具是半结构化访谈。访谈包括提问并从参与者那里获取答案。调查了22位专家对结直肠癌筛查指南的看法。

结果

对所选国家的筛查计划进行了比较。根据风险组和亚组数量、风险评估标准、起始年龄、建议、筛查方法和间隔对各国进行了调查。澳大利亚和美国有三个风险组,加拿大有两个风险组。国家指南中定义了四个风险组,包括高风险、风险增加、平均风险和低风险组。高风险组由8个亚组组成,风险增加组由3个亚组组成,平均风险组包含4个亚组。设计了遗传性综合征的批准临床标准以及遗传和病理调查路线图。

结论

指南和路径在结直肠癌筛查计划的质量改进中起着至关重要的作用。根据伊朗结直肠癌的环境和遗传标准对国家指南进行了完善。这些指南按风险组提供了循证建议。国家路径作为一种风险评估工具,可以在实践中评估和改善癌症筛查的过程和结果。未来研究的建议之一是设计用于临床互动期间实时决策的专家系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/e7acccfb121a/GHFBB-S53-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/1bab9ed496a7/GHFBB-S53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/5e3bed201dac/GHFBB-S53-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/64bfe84ef3fd/GHFBB-S53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/56cb11fbcfc5/GHFBB-S53-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/22184755fb24/GHFBB-S53-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/e7acccfb121a/GHFBB-S53-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/1bab9ed496a7/GHFBB-S53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/5e3bed201dac/GHFBB-S53-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/64bfe84ef3fd/GHFBB-S53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/56cb11fbcfc5/GHFBB-S53-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/22184755fb24/GHFBB-S53-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/5310801/e7acccfb121a/GHFBB-S53-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing clinical and genetic guidelines of colorectal cancer screening as an effective roadmap for risk management.制定结直肠癌筛查的临床和遗传指南,作为风险管理的有效路线图。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Dec;9(Suppl1):S53-S61.
2
Electronic Risk Assessment System as an Appropriate Tool for the Prevention of Cancer: a Qualitative Study.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8595-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8595.
3
Information Engineering and Workflow Design in a Clinical Decision Support System for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Iran.伊朗结直肠癌筛查临床决策支持系统中的信息工程与工作流程设计
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6605-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6605.
4
Evidence-based clinical guidelines in Kyrgyz Republic.吉尔吉斯共和国基于证据的临床指南。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S45-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150683.
5
No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.第385号——盆腔检查的适应症
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.007.
6
Clinical Practice Guideline on Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a Family History of Nonhereditary Colorectal Cancer or Adenoma: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Banff Consensus.家族性非遗传性结直肠癌或腺瘤病史个体的结直肠癌筛查临床实践指南:加拿大胃肠病学协会班夫共识。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1325-1347.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
7
[Systematic review of the methodology quality and reporting quality in colorectal cancer screening guidelines].[结直肠癌筛查指南的方法学质量与报告质量的系统评价]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 6;53(4):398-404. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.04.013.
8
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.国际循证指南关于多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理的推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理的国际循证指南推荐意见。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.
10
The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.专家共识指南系列。优化精神障碍的药物治疗。引言:方法、评论与总结。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 12:5-19.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
2
Cancer ecosystem assessment in West Africa: health systems gaps to prevent and control cancers in three countries: Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal.西非癌症生态系统评估:加纳、尼日利亚和塞内加尔三个国家预防和控制癌症方面的卫生系统差距
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Mar 25;35:90. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.35.90.18516. eCollection 2020.
3
Colorectal cancer in iran: molecular epidemiology and screening strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.转移性胰腺癌:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 10;34(23):2784-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1412. Epub 2016 May 31.
2
Clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jun;147(6):388-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.04.003.
3
Colonoscopy and chromoscopy in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes.遗传性结直肠癌综合征中的结肠镜检查和染色内镜检查
伊朗的结直肠癌:分子流行病学与筛查策略
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;2015:643020. doi: 10.1155/2015/643020. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
Fam Cancer. 2016 Jul;15(3):453-5. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9881-9.
4
Colonoscopy Reduces Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Non-Malignant Findings: A Meta-Analysis.结肠镜检查可降低非恶性病变患者的结直肠癌发病率和死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):355-65. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.418. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Electronic Risk Assessment System as an Appropriate Tool for the Prevention of Cancer: a Qualitative Study.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8595-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8595.
6
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer.日本结直肠癌学会(JSCCR)2014年结直肠癌治疗指南。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;20(2):207-39. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0801-z. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
Benefits and risks of colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查的益处与风险。
Oncol Res Treat. 2014;37 Suppl 3:11-20. doi: 10.1159/000364886. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
8
Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.结直肠癌筛查参与的获益和障碍:一项系统综述和定性研究综合的方案。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 27;4(2):e004508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004508.
9
What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?当前癌症筛查决策辅助工具的不足之处是什么?
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May;63(3):193-214. doi: 10.3322/caac.21180. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
10
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication.欧洲结直肠癌筛查和诊断质量保证指南:全文补编出版物概述和介绍。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):51-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325997. Epub 2012 Dec 4.