Luo Hui, Yu Xinshuang, Liang Ning, Xie Jian, Deng Guodong, Liu Qiqi, Zhang Jingxin, Zhang Jiandong, Ge Hong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Department of Radiation Oncology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Department of Oncology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong Division of Graduated, Weifang Medical College, Shandong, P.R. China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(8):e6165. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006165.
The efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published papers to quantitatively evaluate the potential benefit of induction chemotherapy.
Eligible studies of induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were retrieved through extensive searches of the PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from 1994 to 2015. We excluded studies that using non-English. Our primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary end point was toxicity.
Two studies of induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT versus CCRT alone and 5 studies of induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT versus CCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy published in the same period were selected and analyzed. Our results showed that there was significant benefit of induction chemotherapy plus CCRT compared to CCRT alone on 5-year OS without 1, 2, 3, and 4 years OS. Our analysis also indicated that induction chemotherapy was as effect as consolidation chemotherapy for patients who received CCRT on overall response and OS. Treatment-related toxicity was similar between the 2 group; however, leucopenia was significant decreased in patients treated by induction chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.62; P < 0.00001).
Five year OS could be improved when induction chemotherapy was added into CCRT for patients of NSCLC. Except low rate of leucopenia, induction chemotherapy was no difference compared to consolidation chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC treated by CCRT.
对于局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,诱导化疗后序贯同步放化疗(CCRT)的疗效和毒性尚不清楚,我们对已发表的论文进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以定量评估诱导化疗的潜在益处。
通过广泛检索1994年至2015年的PubMed、Science Direct、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,获取符合条件的诱导化疗和放化疗研究。我们排除了使用非英语的研究。我们的主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点是毒性。
选取并分析了同期发表的2项关于诱导化疗后序贯CCRT与单纯CCRT对比的研究,以及5项诱导化疗后序贯CCRT与CCRT后巩固化疗对比的研究。我们的结果显示,与单纯CCRT相比,诱导化疗联合CCRT在5年总生存期方面有显著益处,而在1年、2年、3年和4年总生存期方面无显著差异。我们的分析还表明,对于接受CCRT的患者,诱导化疗在总体缓解率和总生存期方面与巩固化疗效果相当。两组的治疗相关毒性相似;然而,诱导化疗组患者的白细胞减少症显著减少(优势比[OR]=0.43;95%置信区间[CI],0.30 - 0.62;P<0.00001)。
对于NSCLC患者,在CCRT中加入诱导化疗可提高5年总生存期。除白细胞减少率较低外,在接受CCRT治疗的NSCLC患者中,诱导化疗与巩固化疗相比无差异。