Suppr超能文献

为什么人们表现得像谚语中的鸵鸟?探究人们不监测目标进展的原因。

Why Do People Act Like the Proverbial Ostrich? Investigating the Reasons That People Provide for Not Monitoring Their Goal Progress.

作者信息

Chang Betty P I, Webb Thomas L, Benn Yael

机构信息

Centre for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences, Centre for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles, Belgium.

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 8;8:152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00152. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Two studies examined peoples' reasons for not monitoring their progress toward their personal goals-a phenomenon that has been termed "the ostrich problem" (Webb et al., 2013). Study 1 used factor analysis to organize the reasons that people gave for not monitoring their goal progress, resulting in 10 factors. The most strongly endorsed reasons were: (a) that information on goal progress would demand a change in beliefs, or (b) undesired action; (c) that progress was poor, and (d) that thinking about and/or working on the goal was associated with negative emotions. Study 2 adopted a prospective design and investigated whether the reasons identified in Study 1 predicted: (a) the likelihood that participants would decline an opportunity to monitor their goal progress, and (b) the frequency with which participants monitored their goal progress. We found evidence that some of the most strongly endorsed reasons from Study 1 also predicted the avoidance of monitoring in Study 2; however, the belief that information about goal progress was likely to be inaccurate and not useful, and perceived control over goal attainment also reliably predicted the avoidance of monitoring in Study 2. Taken together, the findings explain why people do not monitor their goal progress and point to potential avenues for intervention.

摘要

两项研究考察了人们不监测自身朝着个人目标进展情况的原因——这一现象被称为“鸵鸟问题”(韦伯等人,2013年)。研究1运用因素分析来梳理人们给出的不监测目标进展的原因,得出了10个因素。得到最强烈认可的原因是:(a)目标进展信息会要求信念改变,或(b)有不期望的行动;(c)进展不佳,以及(d)思考和/或致力于该目标会引发负面情绪。研究2采用前瞻性设计,调查了研究1中确定的原因是否能预测:(a)参与者拒绝监测目标进展机会的可能性,以及(b)参与者监测目标进展的频率。我们发现有证据表明,研究1中一些得到最强烈认可的原因也能预测研究2中对监测的回避;然而,认为目标进展信息可能不准确且无用,以及对目标实现的感知控制也能可靠地预测研究2中对监测的回避。综合来看,这些发现解释了人们为何不监测目标进展,并指出了潜在的干预途径。

相似文献

2
Which Factors Are Associated with Monitoring Goal Progress?哪些因素与监测目标进展相关?
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 24;8:434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00434. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
What is the psychological impact of self-weighing? A meta-analysis.自我称重的心理影响是什么?一项荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Jun;10(2):187-203. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1138871. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
3
Reducing health-information avoidance through contemplation.通过沉思减少健康信息回避。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1696-703. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478616. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
6
Reducing information avoidance through affirmation.通过肯定来减少信息回避。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):141-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797611424164. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
7
Stuck in the middle: the psychophysics of goal pursuit.陷入困境:目标追求的心理物理学。
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):607-12. doi: 10.1177/0956797611404899. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验