• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Opioid Use for Pain Management After Implementation of a Medicaid Short-Acting Opioid Quantity Limit.医疗补助计划中短期阿片类药物限量实施后用于疼痛管理的阿片类药物使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):346-354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.346.
2
Incremental Effect of the Addition of Prescriber Restrictions on a State Medicaid's Pharmacy-Only Patient Review and Restriction Program.医师限制附加对州医疗补助计划的仅限药房患者审查和限制项目的增量效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):875-883. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.875.
3
Evaluation of Abuse-Deterrent or Tamper-Resistant Opioid Formulations on Overall Health Care Expenditures in a State Medicaid Program.评估阿片类药物滥用预防或防篡改配方对州医疗补助计划中整体医疗保健支出的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Apr;22(4):347-56. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.4.347.
4
Implementation of an opioid management initiative by a state Medicaid program.州医疗补助计划实施阿片类药物管理计划。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 May;20(5):447-54. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.5.447.
5
The Effect of a Federal Controlled Substance Act Schedule Change on Hydrocodone Combination Products Claims in a Medicaid Population.《联邦管制物质法案附表变更对医疗补助人群中氢可酮复方制剂索赔的影响》
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):532-539. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.532.
6
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
7
Opioid Analgesics in Georgia Medicaid: Trends in Potential Inappropriate Prescribing Practices by Demographic Characteristics, 2009-2014.佐治亚州医疗补助计划中的阿片类镇痛药:2009 - 2014年按人口特征划分的潜在不适当处方行为趋势
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9):886-894. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.9.886.
8
Changes in Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use Following a Low-Touch Prescriber Fax Intervention.低接触式处方传真干预后同时使用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的变化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):160-167. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.160.
9
Opioid Treatment Patterns Following Prescription of Immediate-Release Hydrocodone.氢可酮速释制剂处方后阿片类药物治疗模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Apr;22(4):358-66. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.4.358.
10
Safer and more appropriate opioid prescribing: a large healthcare system's comprehensive approach.更安全、更恰当的阿片类药物处方开具:一个大型医疗系统的综合方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1173-1179. doi: 10.1111/jep.12756. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes After a Statewide Policy to Improve Evidence-Based Treatment of Back Pain Among Medicaid Enrollees in Oregon.俄勒冈州一项旨在改善医疗补助计划参保者背痛循证治疗的全州性政策实施后的效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):402-411. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08776-w. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Prescription quantity and duration predict progression from acute to chronic opioid use in opioid-naïve Medicaid patients.处方剂量和用药时长可预测初次使用阿片类药物的医疗补助患者从急性阿片类药物使用发展为慢性阿片类药物使用的情况。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000075. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
3
Opioid Dose Trajectories and Associations With Mortality, Opioid Use Disorder, Continued Opioid Therapy, and Health Plan Disenrollment.阿片类药物剂量轨迹与死亡率、阿片类药物使用障碍、持续阿片类药物治疗和健康计划退保的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2234671. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34671.
4
Association of opioid utilization management with prescribing and overdose.阿片类药物利用管理与处方和过量用药的关联。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Feb 1;28(2):e63-e68. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88829.
5
Evaluation of a Medicaid performance improvement project to reduce high-dose opioid prescriptions.评估医疗补助绩效改进项目以减少大剂量阿片类药物处方。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07477-6.
6
Impact of drug utilization management policy on prescription opioid use in Georgia Medicaid.药物使用管理政策对佐治亚州医疗补助计划中处方阿片类药物使用的影响。
J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 22;12(2):188-193. doi: 10.1093/jphsr/rmaa026. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Stakeholders' Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Use of Take-Home-Naloxone.利益相关者对影响使用纳洛酮带回家计划因素的看法。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Dec 3;8(4):232. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040232.
8
Managed Care Pharmacy Research on Inappropriate Opioid Use Interventions.管理式医疗药房关于不适当阿片类药物使用干预措施的研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1199-1202. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1199a.
9
A Rapid Review of the Impact of Systems-Level Policies and Interventions on Population-Level Outcomes Related to the Opioid Epidemic, United States and Canada, 2014-2018.2014 - 2018年美国和加拿大系统层面政策与干预措施对与阿片类药物流行相关的人群层面结果影响的快速回顾
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(1_suppl):100S-127S. doi: 10.1177/0033354920922975.
10
Changes in Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use Following a Low-Touch Prescriber Fax Intervention.低接触式处方传真干预后同时使用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的变化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):160-167. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.160.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.美国 2016 年慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Mar 18;65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1.
2
What we know, and don't know, about the impact of state policy and systems-level interventions on prescription drug overdose.关于国家政策和系统层面干预措施对处方药过量用药的影响,我们已知和未知的情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Dec 1;145:34-47. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
Out-of-plan pharmacy use by members of a managed care organization.管理式医疗组织成员的计划外药房使用情况。
Perm J. 2012 Spring;16(2):15-21. doi: 10.7812/tpp/11-148.
4
Bending the prescription opioid dosing and mortality curves: impact of the Washington State opioid dosing guideline.弯曲处方类阿片药物剂量与死亡率曲线:华盛顿州类阿片药物剂量指南的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Apr;55(4):325-31. doi: 10.1002/ajim.21998. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
5
Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths.阿片类药物处方模式与阿片类药物过量相关死亡之间的关联。
JAMA. 2011 Apr 6;305(13):1315-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.370.
6
Opioid prescriptions for chronic pain and overdose: a cohort study.慢性疼痛和阿片类药物处方与过量用药:队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):85-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00006.

医疗补助计划中短期阿片类药物限量实施后用于疼痛管理的阿片类药物使用情况。

Opioid Use for Pain Management After Implementation of a Medicaid Short-Acting Opioid Quantity Limit.

机构信息

1 Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora; Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; and Regis University School of Pharmacy Rueckert-Hartman College for Health Professions, Denver, Colorado.

2 Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):346-354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.346.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.346
PMID:28230448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United States is currently experiencing an opioid abuse epidemic. Many policies and programs have been implemented at local, state, and national levels in an attempt to decrease prescription opioid addiction and overdose. On August 1, 2014, Colorado Medicaid implemented a policy change that limited the quantity of short-acting opioids (SAOs) that could be filled through the Medicaid benefit to no more than 4 tablets per day, or 120 tablets in 30 days.

OBJECTIVE

To compare mean total daily dose (TDD) of opioids purchased by Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) Medicaid patients before and after implementation of the Medicaid SAO quantity limit.

METHODS

This investigation used a pre/post study design to compare opioid use in Medicaid-eligible patients during the 90 days before implementation of the Medicaid quantity limit on August 1, 2014, and 90 days after full implementation of the change on December 31, 2014. The study was conducted at KPCO, an integrated care delivery system providing medical care for approximately 615,000 patients, of which over 54,000 are Medicaid members. Electronic medical and pharmacy records were used to identify patients and assess medication use.

RESULTS

There was a small difference in opioid use in the population of Medicaid opioid users as evidenced by the median TDD of oral morphine equivalents (OME) purchased decreasing from 6.8 mg (IQR = 2.2-25.8) in the pre-implementation period to 6.6 mg (IQR = 1.7-24.0) in the postimplementation period (P = 0.027). The proportion of patients purchasing more than 120 mg OME per day and the proportion of patients purchasing long-acting opioids (LAOs) did not change significantly from the pre- to postimplementation period (OME > 120 of 4.2% vs. 3.6%, respectively, P = 0.290; LAO use of 12.9% vs. 13.6%, respectively, P = 0.465).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a statistically significant 3% decrease of 0.2 mg OME per day in the primary study population. A 24% reduction of 10 mg OME per day before and after implementation of the Medicaid SAO quantity limit was found in those patients identified as exceeding the Medicaid SAO quantity limit at baseline. These patients tended to be purchasing low to moderate total daily doses of opioids at baseline.

DISCLOSURES

Internal funding was provided by the Department of Pharmacy at Kaiser Permanente Colorado. There are no external funding sources to disclose. Riggs, Milchak, Patel, and Heilmann are employed by Kaiser Permanente Colorado. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Riggs, Heilmann, and Billups, along with the other authors. Billups collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Riggs, Milchak, and Flores, with assistance from the other authors. The manuscript was written primarily by Riggs, along with Flores, and revised by Billups, Milchak, Patel, and Heilmann.

摘要

背景

美国目前正经历阿片类药物滥用的流行。为了减少处方类阿片成瘾和过量用药,美国各地各级政府都实施了许多政策和项目。2014 年 8 月 1 日,科罗拉多州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)实施了一项政策变更,将通过医疗补助福利开出的短效阿片类药物(SAO)的数量限制在每天不超过 4 片,或 30 天内不超过 120 片。

目的

比较 Kaiser Permanente Colorado(KPCO)医疗补助计划的患者在实施医疗补助 SAO 数量限制前后的平均每日总剂量(TDD)。

方法

本研究采用前后研究设计,比较 2014 年 8 月 1 日实施医疗补助数量限制前 90 天和 2014 年 12 月 31 日完全实施变更后 90 天期间符合医疗补助条件的患者的阿片类药物使用情况。研究在 KPCO 进行,这是一个提供医疗服务的综合医疗服务系统,为大约 615000 名患者提供医疗服务,其中超过 54000 名是医疗补助计划的成员。电子医疗和药房记录用于识别患者并评估药物使用情况。

结果

医疗补助计划阿片类药物使用者人群的阿片类药物使用情况略有差异,表现在口服吗啡当量(OME)的中位数 TDD 从实施前的 6.8 毫克(IQR=2.2-25.8)降至实施后的 6.6 毫克(IQR=1.7-24.0)(P=0.027)。购买每天超过 120 毫克 OME 的患者比例和购买长效阿片类药物(LAO)的患者比例在实施前后均无显著变化(OME>120 分别为 4.2%和 3.6%,P=0.290;LAO 使用率分别为 12.9%和 13.6%,P=0.465)。

结论

本研究发现主要研究人群的 OME 日剂量减少了 3%,统计学上有显著意义,每天减少 0.2 毫克。在基线时超过医疗补助 SAO 数量限制的患者中,实施医疗补助 SAO 数量限制前后,每天减少 10 毫克 OME。这些患者在基线时往往购买低至中等剂量的阿片类药物。

披露

科罗拉多州 Kaiser Permanente 的药房部门提供内部资金。没有外部资金来源需要披露。Riggs、Milchak、Patel 和 Heilmann 受雇于 Kaiser Permanente Colorado。作者报告没有其他潜在的利益冲突。Riggs、Heilmann 和 Billups 提出了研究概念和设计,其他作者也参与其中。Billups 收集了数据,Riggs、Milchak 和 Flores 进行了数据解释,并得到了其他作者的帮助。该手稿主要由 Riggs 与 Flores 撰写,并由 Billups、Milchak、Patel 和 Heilmann 修订。