Volgger Veronika, Felicio Axelle, Lohscheller Jörg, Englhard Anna S, Al-Muzaini Hanan, Betz Christian S, Schuster Maria E
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Informatics, Trier University of Applied Sciences, Schneidershof, 54208, Trier, Germany.
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Aug;49(6):609-618. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22652. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
Laryngeal lesions are usually investigated by microlaryngoscopy, biopsy, and histopathology. This study aimed to evaluate the combined use of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and High-Speed Imaging (HSI) in the differentiation of glottic lesions in awake patients.
Prospective diagnostic study.
Thirty-six awake patients with 41 glottic lesions were investigated with both NBI and HSI, and the suspected diagnoses were compared to the histopathological results of tissue biopsies taken during subsequent microlaryngoscopies. Of the 41 lesions, 28 were primary lesions and 13 recurrent lesions after previous laryngeal pathologies.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in the differentiation between benign/premalignant and malignant lesions with both NBI and HSI accounted to 100.0%, 79.4%, 50.0%, and 100.0%. Sensitivities and specificities were 100.0% and 85.7% for HSI alone, and 100.0% and 79.4% for NBI alone. Regarding only primary lesions the results were generally better with sensitivities and specificities of 100% and 81% for NBI, 100% and 84.2% for HSI and 100% and 85.7% for the combination of both methods, respectively.
NBI and HSI both seem to be promising adjunct tools in the differentiation of various laryngeal lesions in awake patients with high sensitivities. Specificities, however, were moderate but could be increased when using NBI and HSI in combination in a subgroup of patients with only primary lesions. Although both methods still have limitations they might ameliorate the evaluation of suspicious laryngeal lesions in the future and could possibly spare patients from repeated invasive tissue biopsies. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:609-618, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
喉部病变通常通过显微喉镜检查、活检和组织病理学进行研究。本研究旨在评估窄带成像(NBI)和高速成像(HSI)联合应用于清醒患者声门病变鉴别诊断的价值。
前瞻性诊断研究。
对36例清醒的患有41处声门病变的患者进行了NBI和HSI检查,并将疑似诊断结果与随后显微喉镜检查期间所取组织活检的组织病理学结果进行比较。在这41处病变中,28处为原发性病变,13处为既往喉部病变后的复发性病变。
NBI和HSI联合用于鉴别良性/癌前病变与恶性病变时的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100.0%、79.4%、50.0%和100.0%。单独使用HSI时的敏感性和特异性分别为100.0%和85.7%,单独使用NBI时分别为100.0%和79.4%。仅针对原发性病变而言,结果总体上更好,NBI的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和81%,HSI分别为100%和84.2%,两种方法联合使用时分别为100%和85.7%。
NBI和HSI似乎都是鉴别清醒患者各种喉部病变的有前景的辅助工具,敏感性较高。然而,特异性中等,但在仅患有原发性病变的患者亚组中联合使用NBI和HSI时特异性可能会提高。尽管这两种方法仍有局限性,但它们可能会改善未来对可疑喉部病变的评估,并有可能使患者避免重复进行侵入性组织活检。《激光外科与医学》2017年第49卷,609 - 618页。© 2017威利期刊公司