Duffy Deborah L, de Moura Roseana T Diniz, Serpell James A
Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6010, USA.
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 3):329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
A questionnaire instrument for obtaining quantitative behavioral evaluations of pet cats from cat owners was developed and validated. Exploratory Factor Analysis of 2608 questionnaire responses to 149 behavioral questions/items extracted a total of 23 distinct factors that measured most of the more common dimensions of cat behavior. Seventeen of the 23 factors demonstrated adequate-high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.712-0.923). Questionnaire validation was accomplished by determining: (a) whether owners' subjective ratings of the severity of their cat's behavior problems were associated with cats' actual scores on expected questionnaire factors, (b) whether expected associations between specific demographic and/or lifestyle characteristics and behavior were confirmed by cats' factor or item scores on the questionnaire, and (c) whether breed rankings based on owner-reported factor scores matched those previously derived from the opinions of experts (veterinarians). The results of these various tests confirmed the overall construct validity of the questionnaire.
开发并验证了一种用于从猫主人那里获取宠物猫定量行为评估的问卷调查工具。对149个行为问题/条目的2608份问卷回复进行探索性因素分析,共提取出23个不同的因素,这些因素测量了猫行为的大多数较常见维度。23个因素中有17个表现出足够高的内部信度(克朗巴哈系数α=0.712-0.923)。问卷验证通过以下方式完成:(a) 确定猫主人对其猫行为问题严重程度的主观评分是否与猫在预期问卷因素上的实际得分相关;(b) 特定人口统计学和/或生活方式特征与行为之间的预期关联是否通过问卷上猫的因素或条目得分得到证实;(c) 根据主人报告的因素得分得出的品种排名是否与先前从专家(兽医)意见中得出的排名相匹配。这些各种测试的结果证实了问卷的整体结构效度。