• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用弗拉芒地区猫科动物行为评估问卷(Fe-BARQ)对动物辅助服务(AAS)中的猫与非AAS猫的行为特征差异进行研究。

Behavioural Profile Differences Between Cats in Animal-Assisted Services (AAS) and Non-AAS Cats Using the Fe-BARQ in Flanders.

作者信息

Delanoeije Joni, Moons Christel Palmyre Henri, Peeters Els Helena Karel Anna, Pendry Patricia

机构信息

Work and Organisation Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Hendrik Conscienceplein 8 Box 3530, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.

Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen), Egmontstraat 5, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;15(1):33. doi: 10.3390/ani15010033.

DOI:10.3390/ani15010033
PMID:39794976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11718785/
Abstract

The engagement of cats in animal-assisted services (AAS) is increasing. This is surprising given that feline behavioural needs have been perceived as contradictory to conditions associated with AAS engagement, leading to the assumption that cats as a species are not suitable for AAS. However, important within-species variability in behavioural traits nuancing this assumption has not been addressed. Therefore, this study aimed to map the behavioural profiles of cats engaged in AAS and non-AAS cats to detect behavioural profile differences between these groups. Such differences could point to AAS cats being selected to engage in AAS based upon particular behavioural traits or, relatedly, to AAS cats coping differently with AAS features. Using a Flemish translation of the Feline Behavioural Assessment and Research Questionnaire (Fe-BARQ), cross-sectional survey data on various cats' ( = 474) behavioural indices were collected. Using Mann-Whitney U-tests, results indicate that AAS cats significantly differed from non-AAS cats on five out of 19 behavioural subscales. Specifically, AAS cats scored higher on sociability with people, attention seeking, sociability with cats and predatory behaviour, and they scored lower on resistance to restraint. While this study did not allow for assessing explanations for these differences, findings suggest that cats in AAS may be intentionally or unintentionally selected for behavioural traits perceived as desirable for engagement in AAS. While we refrain from drawing conclusions regarding the "suitability" of cats based solely on our findings, our study contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding critical themes around AAS-engaging cats. Furthermore, our findings provide a first indication of the reliability of a translation of a well-validated measurement tool suitable to map behavioural traits of cats in Flanders engaged in AAS.

摘要

猫参与动物辅助服务(AAS)的情况正在增加。考虑到猫的行为需求被认为与参与AAS的相关条件相矛盾,这一现象令人惊讶,从而导致人们认为猫作为一个物种不适合AAS。然而,尚未探讨行为特征中重要的种内变异性对这一假设的影响。因此,本研究旨在描绘参与AAS的猫和未参与AAS的猫的行为概况,以检测这两组猫之间的行为概况差异。这种差异可能表明,参与AAS的猫是基于特定行为特征被挑选出来参与AAS的,或者相关地,参与AAS的猫对AAS特征的应对方式有所不同。使用《猫行为评估与研究问卷》(Fe-BARQ)的佛兰芒语译本,收集了关于各类猫(n = 474)行为指标的横断面调查数据。使用曼-惠特尼U检验,结果表明,在19个行为子量表中的5个上,参与AAS的猫与未参与AAS的猫存在显著差异。具体而言,参与AAS的猫在与人类的社交性、寻求关注、与猫的社交性和捕食行为方面得分较高,而在对约束的抵抗力方面得分较低。虽然本研究无法评估这些差异的原因,但研究结果表明,参与AAS的猫可能是有意或无意地因其被认为适合参与AAS的行为特征而被挑选出来的。虽然我们不会仅根据我们的研究结果就猫的“适用性”得出结论,但我们的研究有助于围绕参与AAS的猫的关键主题展开持续讨论。此外,我们的研究结果首次表明,一种经过充分验证的测量工具的译本适用于描绘佛兰芒地区参与AAS的猫的行为特征,具有一定的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Behavioural Profile Differences Between Cats in Animal-Assisted Services (AAS) and Non-AAS Cats Using the Fe-BARQ in Flanders.使用弗拉芒地区猫科动物行为评估问卷(Fe-BARQ)对动物辅助服务(AAS)中的猫与非AAS猫的行为特征差异进行研究。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;15(1):33. doi: 10.3390/ani15010033.
2
Flat-Faced or Non-Flat-Faced Cats? That Is the Question.扁脸猫还是非扁脸猫?这是个问题。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;13(2):206. doi: 10.3390/ani13020206.
3
Conspecific and Human Sociality in the Domestic Cat: Consideration of Proximate Mechanisms, Human Selection and Implications for Cat Welfare.家猫的同种社会性与人类社会性:对近因机制、人类选择及猫福利影响的考量
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;12(3):298. doi: 10.3390/ani12030298.
4
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Behavioural Tendencies of Cats and Dogs in Japan.新冠疫情对日本猫和狗行为倾向的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;13(13):2217. doi: 10.3390/ani13132217.
5
Development and evaluation of the Fe-BARQ: A new survey instrument for measuring behavior in domestic cats (Felis s. catus).Fe-BARQ的开发与评估:一种用于测量家猫(Felis s. catus)行为的新调查工具。
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 3):329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Prevalence of behavioural signs commonly associated with feline hyperaesthesia syndrome among healthy cats.
J Small Anim Pract. 2025 Oct;66(10):700-707. doi: 10.1111/jsap.13878. Epub 2025 May 3.
7
Normal feline behaviour: … and why problem behaviours develop.正常猫科动物行为:……以及问题行为产生的原因。
J Feline Med Surg. 2018 May;20(5):411-421. doi: 10.1177/1098612X18771203.
8
The Development of a Novel Questionnaire Approach to the Investigation of Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour.一种用于调查马匹训练、管理和行为的新型问卷方法的开发。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 24;10(11):1960. doi: 10.3390/ani10111960.
9
Providing Humans With Practical, Best Practice Handling Guidelines During Human-Cat Interactions Increases Cats' Affiliative Behaviour and Reduces Aggression and Signs of Conflict.在人与猫互动过程中为人类提供实用的最佳实践处理指南,可增加猫的亲和行为,减少攻击性和冲突迹象。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jul 23;8:714143. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.714143. eCollection 2021.
10
Amino Acids in the Nutrition, Metabolism, and Health of Domestic Cats.氨基酸在宠物猫的营养、代谢和健康中的作用。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1285:217-231. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-54462-1_11.

引用本文的文献

1
Hair Cortisol and Fe-BARQ: Evaluating Chronic Stress and Behavior in Cats with Chronic Kidney Disease.毛发皮质醇与Fe-BARQ:评估慢性肾病猫的慢性应激和行为
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;15(6):889. doi: 10.3390/ani15060889.
2
"Pet effect" patterns: Dynamics of animal presence and caregiver affect across (tele)work and non-work contexts.“宠物效应”模式:(远程)工作和非工作环境中动物陪伴与照料者影响的动态变化
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 20;20(2):e0319009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319009. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Gaps Concerning Human-Animal Interactions and Animal-Assisted Services in Nursing Homes.养老院中人与动物互动及动物辅助服务方面的研究空白。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Jun;25(6):104916. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.12.004. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Selection of Appropriate Dogs to Be Therapy Dogs Using the C-BARQ.使用犬类行为问卷(C-BARQ)选择合适的治疗犬。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;13(5):834. doi: 10.3390/ani13050834.
3
Development of Desirable Behaviors in Dog-Assisted Interventions.犬辅助干预中期望行为的发展。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;12(4):477. doi: 10.3390/ani12040477.
4
Animal-assisted interventions in universities: a scoping review of implementation and associated outcomes.动物辅助干预在大学中的应用:实施情况及相关结果的范围综述。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac001.
5
Recommendations for Transdisciplinary Professional Competencies and Ethics for Animal-Assisted Therapies and Interventions.动物辅助治疗与干预的跨学科专业能力及伦理建议。
Vet Sci. 2021 Dec 2;8(12):303. doi: 10.3390/vetsci8120303.
6
Unanswered Questions and Hypotheses about Domestic Cat Behavior, Ecology, and the Cat-Human Relationship.关于家猫行为、生态以及猫与人类关系的未解决问题和假设。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;11(10):2823. doi: 10.3390/ani11102823.
7
Providing Humans With Practical, Best Practice Handling Guidelines During Human-Cat Interactions Increases Cats' Affiliative Behaviour and Reduces Aggression and Signs of Conflict.在人与猫互动过程中为人类提供实用的最佳实践处理指南,可增加猫的亲和行为,减少攻击性和冲突迹象。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jul 23;8:714143. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.714143. eCollection 2021.
8
Personality and Cognitive Profiles of Animal-Assisted Intervention Dogs and Pet Dogs in an Unsolvable Task.动物辅助干预犬和宠物犬在无法解决的任务中的性格与认知特征
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;11(7):2144. doi: 10.3390/ani11072144.
9
Enhancing the Selection and Performance of Working Dogs.提高工作犬的选拔与性能
Front Vet Sci. 2021 May 12;8:644431. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.644431. eCollection 2021.
10
Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks.动物辅助干预:益处与风险的系统评价
Eur J Integr Med. 2016 Oct;8(5):695-706. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 20.