Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forest Sciences, School for Forest Management, Forest-Landscape-Society Network, PO Box 43, SE-739 21 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forest Sciences, School for Forest Management, Forest-Landscape-Society Network, PO Box 43, SE-739 21 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden; Ivan Franko National University, Faculty of Geography, Doroshenko Street 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine; WWF Danube Carpathian Programme, Mushaka Street 42, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine.
J Environ Manage. 2017 May 15;193:300-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
The functionality of forest patches and networks as green infrastructure may be affected negatively both by expanding road networks and forestry intensification. We assessed the effects of (1) the current and planned road infrastructure, and (2) forest loss and gain, on the remaining large forest landscape massifs as green infrastructure at the EU's eastern border region in post-socialistic transition. First, habitat patch and network functionality in 1996-98 was assessed using habitat suitability index modelling. Second, we made expert interviews about road development with planners in 10 administrative regions in Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. Third, forest loss and gain inside the forest massifs, and gain outside them during the period 2001-14 were measured. This EU cross-border region hosts four remaining forest massifs as regional green infrastructure hotspots. While Poland's road network is developing fast in terms of new freeways, city bypasses and upgrades of road quality, in Belarus and Ukraine the focus is on maintenance of existing roads, and no new corridors. We conclude that economic support from the EU, and thus rapid development of roads in Poland, is likely to reduce the permeability for wildlife of the urban and agricultural matrix around existing forest massifs. However, the four identified forest massifs themselves, forming the forest landscape green infrastructure at the EU's east border, were little affected by road development plans. In contrast, forest loss inside massifs was high, especially in Ukraine. Only in Poland forest loss was balanced by gain. Forest gain outside forest massifs was low. To conclude, pro-active and collaborative spatial planning across different sectors and countries is needed to secure functional forest green infrastructure as base for biodiversity conservation and human well-being.
森林斑块和网络作为绿色基础设施的功能可能会受到扩展道路网络和林业集约化的负面影响。我们评估了(1)当前和规划中的道路基础设施,以及(2)森林损失和增益对作为欧盟东部边境后社会主义转型地区绿色基础设施的剩余大型森林景观块状物的影响。首先,使用栖息地适宜性指数模型评估了 1996-98 年的栖息地斑块和网络功能。其次,我们与波兰、白俄罗斯和乌克兰的 10 个行政区的规划者进行了关于道路发展的专家访谈。第三,测量了森林块状物内部的森林损失和增益,以及 2001-14 年期间森林块状物外部的森林增益。这个欧盟跨境地区拥有四个剩余的森林块状物作为区域绿色基础设施热点。虽然波兰的道路网络在新高速公路、城市旁路和道路质量升级方面发展迅速,但在白俄罗斯和乌克兰,重点是维护现有道路,而不是新建走廊。我们得出的结论是,欧盟的经济支持,以及波兰道路的快速发展,可能会降低现有森林块状物周围城市和农业基质中野生动物的通透性。然而,作为欧盟东部边境森林景观绿色基础设施的四个已确定的森林块状物本身几乎没有受到道路发展计划的影响。相比之下,森林块状物内部的森林损失很高,尤其是在乌克兰。只有在波兰,森林损失才被增益所平衡。森林块状物外部的森林增益很低。总之,需要跨不同部门和国家进行积极和协作的空间规划,以确保作为生物多样性保护和人类福祉基础的功能性森林绿色基础设施。