Dooley James, Lagou Vasiliki, Dresselaers Tom, van Dongen Katinka A, Himmelreich Uwe, Liston Adrian
Translational Immunology Laboratory, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Biomedical MRI/MoSAIC, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Front Oncol. 2017 Feb 9;7:18. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00018. eCollection 2017.
Pancreatic cancer has an extremely poor prognosis, largely due to a poor record for early detection. Known risk factors for pancreatic cancer include obesity, diet, and diabetes, implicating glucose consumption and regulation as a key player. The role of artificial sweeteners may therefore be pertinent to disease kinetics. The oncogenic impact of artificial sweeteners is a highly controversial area. Aspartame, one of the most studied food additives, is widely recognized as being generally safe, although there are still specific areas where research is incomplete due to study limitations. Stevia, by contrast, has been the subject of relatively few studies, and the potential health benefits are based on extrapolation rather than direct testing. Here, we used longitudinal tracking of pancreatic acinar carcinoma development, growth, and lethality in a sensitized mouse model. Despite exposure to aspartame and stevia from the stage onward, we found no disease modification activity, in either direction. These results contribute to the data on aspartame and stevia safety, while also reducing confidence in several of the purported health benefits.
胰腺癌的预后极差,这在很大程度上是由于早期检测效果不佳。已知的胰腺癌风险因素包括肥胖、饮食和糖尿病,这表明葡萄糖消耗和调节是关键因素。因此,人工甜味剂的作用可能与疾病动态变化相关。人工甜味剂的致癌影响是一个极具争议的领域。阿斯巴甜是研究最多的食品添加剂之一,尽管由于研究局限性,仍有一些特定领域的研究不完整,但它被广泛认为总体上是安全的。相比之下,甜菊糖的研究相对较少,其潜在的健康益处是基于推断而非直接测试。在此,我们在一个致敏小鼠模型中对胰腺腺泡癌的发生、发展和致死率进行了纵向跟踪。尽管从实验阶段开始就接触阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖,但我们未发现它们对疾病有任何改变作用,无论朝着哪个方向。这些结果为阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖的安全性数据提供了补充,同时也降低了人们对一些所谓健康益处的信心。