Wagner Eric R, Houdek Matthew T, Hernandez Nicholas M, Cofield Robert H, Sánchez-Sotelo Joaquín, Sperling John W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1448-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
The purpose of this study was to determine the complications and results of cement-within cement-humeral fixation in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
In 38 shoulders, a cemented humeral component was revised to a cemented reverse humeral component using a cement-within-cement technique. The mean follow-up time was 3.7 (2.0-7.0) years. Clinical, radiologic, and hard outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method, Fisher exact test, and Student t-test.
The average operative time for the cement-within-cement technique was 153 minutes. There were 7 (18%) nondisplaced intraoperative fractures involving the greater tuberosity that occurred on implant removal; all healed at last follow-up. A second revision surgery was performed in 3 (8%) patients who underwent cement-in-cement humeral component revision for glenoid loosening (n = 1), periprosthetic instability associated with glenoid loosening (n = 1), and periprosthetic humerus fracture (n = 1). The overall implant revision-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 95% and 91%, respectively. Patients experienced significant pain relief, improvements in their shoulder range of motion, and high satisfaction. There was 1 "at-risk" humeral component (grade 4 or higher humeral lucency, moderate subsidence) that did not undergo revision surgery. There were 2 other humeral components with grade 3 humeral lucency, no subsidence.
Cement-within-cement fixation of the humeral component in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty is associated with a reasonable operative time, good medium-term survival rates, and good pain relief and functional outcomes with low complications. This technique is an important consideration to preserve humeral bone stock and potentially humeral component and implant stability.
本研究的目的是确定翻修反肩关节置换术中骨水泥型肱骨假体固定在骨水泥内的并发症及结果。
对38例肩部病例,采用骨水泥内骨水泥技术将骨水泥固定的肱骨假体翻修为骨水泥固定的反肱骨假体。平均随访时间为3.7(2.0 - 7.0)年。使用Kaplan - Meier生存法、Fisher精确检验和Student t检验评估临床、影像学和硬终点结果。
骨水泥内骨水泥技术的平均手术时间为153分钟。在取出假体时发生7例(18%)未移位的术中骨折,累及大结节;所有骨折在末次随访时均愈合。3例(8%)接受骨水泥内骨水泥肱骨假体翻修的患者因肩胛盂松动(n = 1)、与肩胛盂松动相关的假体周围不稳定(n = 1)和假体周围肱骨骨折(n = 1)进行了二次翻修手术。2年和5年时假体无翻修的总体生存率分别为95%和91%。患者疼痛明显缓解,肩关节活动范围改善,满意度高。有1个“有风险”的肱骨假体(肱骨透亮分级4级或更高,中度下沉)未进行翻修手术。另外有2个肱骨假体肱骨透亮分级为3级,无下沉。
翻修反肩关节置换术中肱骨假体采用骨水泥内骨水泥固定,手术时间合理,中期生存率良好,疼痛缓解和功能结果良好,并发症发生率低。该技术对于保留肱骨骨量以及潜在的肱骨假体和植入物稳定性是一个重要的考虑因素。