Calabria Christopher W, Hauswirth David W, Rank Matthew, Sher Lawrence, Larenas-Linnemann Desiree
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2017 Mar 1;38(2):121-129. doi: 10.2500/aap.2017.38.4024.
Few data exist regarding the use of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in specific high-risk chronic medical conditions and pregnancy, and in young children.
A Web-based survey was sent to American Academy of Asthma Allergy & Immunology members to explore their VIT experience in potential high-risk medical conditions and pregnancy, and in young children. Major problems were defined as "activation of underlying disease and/or VIT not well tolerated (systemic adverse events) and/or VIT discontinued for medical reasons." Results were expressed descriptively.
A total of 697 of 5123 surveys (14%) were completed: 87% of the respondents were based in the United States, and 28% worked in an academic setting. Most respondents (71%) believed that pregnancy was a contraindication for starting VIT. Most were comfortable continuing VIT (51%) if the woman became pregnant after starting therapy. Of the allergists who treated children, many would give VIT down to age 5 years (42%) or younger, ages 1-4 years (35%). The following list is of the specific medical condition, the number of allergists who used VIT in patients with this condition, and the percentage who reported major problems: severe asthma, 212 (4.2%); hypertension, 287 (1.1%); coronary artery disease, 222 (3.6%); arrhythmias, 136 (3.4%); cerebrovascular disease, 104 (5.1%); cancer in remission, 166 (0%); cancer stable but still under treatment, 44 (7.2%); a history of bone marrow transplantation, 15 (4.9%); a history of solid organ transplantation, 29 (3.6%); human immunodeficiency virus, 53 (1.4%); acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, 24 (6.2%); stable autoimmune disease, 164 (2.8%); mastocytosis, 66 (18.4%); elevated serum tryptase, 101 (10.8%); immunodeficiency 59 (2.5%).
Many allergists were comfortable using VIT in young children and continuing but not starting pregnant women on VIT. VIT was commonly used in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, cancer in remission, and stable autoimmune disease. Major problems were most frequently reported in use with mastocytosis, elevated tryptase, and cancer still under treatment.
关于在特定高危慢性疾病、妊娠以及幼儿中使用毒液免疫疗法(VIT)的数据很少。
向美国哮喘过敏与免疫学会会员发送了一项基于网络的调查问卷,以探究他们在潜在高危疾病、妊娠以及幼儿中使用VIT的经验。主要问题被定义为“基础疾病的激活和/或VIT耐受性不佳(全身性不良事件)和/或因医学原因停用VIT”。结果以描述性方式呈现。
在5123份调查问卷中,共完成了697份(14%):87%的受访者来自美国,28%在学术机构工作。大多数受访者(71%)认为妊娠是开始VIT的禁忌证。如果女性在开始治疗后怀孕,大多数人(51%)对继续使用VIT感到放心。在治疗儿童的过敏症专科医生中,许多人会对5岁(42%)或更小、1 - 4岁(35%)的儿童进行VIT治疗。以下列出了具体的疾病状况、在患有该疾病的患者中使用VIT的过敏症专科医生人数以及报告有主要问题的百分比:重度哮喘,212人(4.2%);高血压,287人(1.1%);冠状动脉疾病,222人(3.6%);心律失常,136人(3.4%);脑血管疾病,104人(5.1%);癌症缓解期,166人(0%);癌症病情稳定但仍在治疗中,44人(7.2%);有骨髓移植史,15人(4.9%);有实体器官移植史,29人(3.6%);人类免疫缺陷病毒,53人(1.4%);获得性免疫缺陷综合征,24人(6.2%);稳定的自身免疫性疾病,164人(2.8%);肥大细胞增多症,66人(18.4%);血清类胰蛋白酶升高,101人(10.8%);免疫缺陷,59人(2.5%)。
许多过敏症专科医生对在幼儿中使用VIT以及对孕妇继续(而非开始)使用VIT感到放心。VIT常用于高血压、冠状动脉疾病、心律失常、癌症缓解期以及稳定的自身免疫性疾病患者。在肥大细胞增多症、类胰蛋白酶升高以及仍在治疗的癌症患者中使用VIT时,最常报告有主要问题。