Retzke Tom, Thoma Michael, Hansson Bill S, Knaden Markus
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Hans-Knoell-Straße 8, Jena 07745, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Hans-Knoell-Straße 8, Jena 07745, Germany
J Exp Biol. 2017 May 15;220(Pt 10):1812-1819. doi: 10.1242/jeb.156232. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
The genetic toolbox in offers a multitude of different effector constructs to silence neurons and neuron populations. In this study, we investigated the potencies of several effector genes - when expressed in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) - to abolish odor-guided behavior in three different bioassays. We found that two of the tested effectors ( and ) are capable of mimicking the mutant phenotype in all of our behavioral paradigms. In both cases, the effectiveness depended on effector expression levels, as full suppression of odor-guided behavior was observed only in flies homozygous for both Gal4-driver and UAS-effector constructs. Interestingly, the impact of the effector genes differed between chemotactic assays (i.e. the fly has to follow an odor gradient to localize the odor source) and anemotactic assays (i.e. the fly has to walk upwind after detecting an attractive odorant). In conclusion, our results underline the importance of performing appropriate control experiments when exploiting the genetic toolbox, and demonstrate that some odor-guided behaviors are more resistant to genetic perturbations than others.
所提供的基因工具箱中有大量不同的效应器构建体,可用于使神经元和神经元群体沉默。在本研究中,我们研究了几种效应基因(在嗅觉感觉神经元(OSN)中表达时)在三种不同生物测定中消除气味引导行为的能力。我们发现,所测试的两种效应器(和)在我们所有的行为范式中都能够模拟突变体表型。在这两种情况下,有效性都取决于效应器的表达水平,因为只有在同时对Gal4驱动子和UAS效应器构建体均为纯合的果蝇中才观察到气味引导行为的完全抑制。有趣的是,效应基因在趋化性测定(即果蝇必须沿着气味梯度来定位气味源)和向风性测定(即果蝇在检测到有吸引力的气味剂后必须逆风行走)中的影响有所不同。总之,我们的结果强调了在利用基因工具箱时进行适当对照实验的重要性,并证明某些气味引导行为比其他行为对基因干扰更具抗性。