Al-Hamed Faez Saleh, Tawfik Mohamed Abdel-Monem, Abdelfadil Ehab, Al-Saleh Mohammed A Q
Master Student at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Professor and Chairman of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;75(6):1124-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
To assess the effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on the healing process of the alveolar socket after surgical extraction of the mandibular third molars.
PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and relevant journals were searched using a combination of specific keywords ("platelet-rich fibrin," "oral surgery," and "third molar"). The final search was conducted on November 2, 2015. Randomized controlled clinical trials, as well as controlled clinical trials, aimed at comparing the effect of PRF versus natural healing after extraction of mandibular third molars were included.
Five randomized controlled trials and one controlled clinical trial were included. There were 335 extractions (168 with PRF and 167 controls) in 183 participants. Considerable heterogeneity in study characteristics, outcome variables, and estimated scales was observed. Positive results were generally recorded for pain, trismus, swelling, periodontal pocket depth, soft tissue healing, and incidence of localized osteitis, but not in all studies. However, no meta-analysis could be conducted for such variables because of the different measurement scales used. The qualitative and meta-analysis results showed no significant improvement in bone healing with PRF-treated sockets compared with the naturally healing sockets.
Within the limitations of the available evidence, PRF seems to have no beneficial role in bone healing after extraction of the mandibular third molars. Future standardized randomized controlled clinical trials are required to estimate the effect of PRF on socket regeneration.
评估富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)对下颌第三磨牙手术拔除后牙槽窝愈合过程的影响。
使用特定关键词组合(“富血小板纤维蛋白”、“口腔外科手术”和“第三磨牙”)检索PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Scopus及相关期刊。最终检索于2015年11月2日进行。纳入旨在比较PRF与下颌第三磨牙拔除后自然愈合效果的随机对照临床试验以及对照临床试验。
纳入五项随机对照试验和一项对照临床试验。183名参与者中有335颗牙齿被拔除(168颗使用PRF,167颗为对照)。观察到研究特征、结局变量和评估量表存在相当大的异质性。疼痛、牙关紧闭、肿胀、牙周袋深度、软组织愈合和局限性骨炎发生率方面一般记录到阳性结果,但并非在所有研究中都如此。然而,由于使用的测量量表不同,无法对这些变量进行荟萃分析。定性和荟萃分析结果显示,与自然愈合的牙槽窝相比,PRF处理的牙槽窝在骨愈合方面无显著改善。
在现有证据的局限性内,PRF在下颌第三磨牙拔除后的骨愈合中似乎没有有益作用。需要未来进行标准化的随机对照临床试验来评估PRF对牙槽窝再生的影响。