Bertrand C, Harzic M
Laboratoire Central de Bactériologie-Virologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris.
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1987;138(5):347-9.
The detection of CMV antibodies is the only routine method available for differentiating seronegative donors who cannot transmit CMV infection from seropositive donors who are latent carriers and who may transmit the infection by blood transfusion or transplant operations. The validity of this selection depends on the sensitivity and specificity of the method used. We compared the results of 46 serums by the following five tests known for their sensitivity: the indirect haemagglutination test, the latex agglutination test (CMV Scan, Becton-Dickinson); two ELISA tests (Enzygnost anti-Cytomegalovirus-Behring; the Abbott CMV total AB EIA), and the IgG CMV Immunocapture Wellcome. The causes of the discrepancies observed in 7 sera are discussed.
检测巨细胞病毒(CMV)抗体是唯一可用于区分血清学阴性、不会传播CMV感染的供者与血清学阳性、为潜伏携带者且可能通过输血或移植手术传播感染的供者的常规方法。这种筛选方法的有效性取决于所使用方法的敏感性和特异性。我们采用以下五种以敏感性著称的检测方法对46份血清的检测结果进行了比较:间接血凝试验、乳胶凝集试验(CMV Scan,Becton-Dickinson公司);两种酶联免疫吸附试验(Enzygnost抗巨细胞病毒 - 贝林公司;雅培CMV总抗体酶免疫测定法),以及IgG CMV免疫捕获法(Wellcome公司)。文中讨论了在7份血清中观察到差异的原因。