Suppr超能文献

颈动脉破裂综合征的血管内治疗

Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome.

作者信息

Bond Kamila M, Brinjikji Waleed, Murad Mohammed H, Cloft Harry J, Lanzino Giuseppe

机构信息

Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a life-threatening complication of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. Endovascular techniques have emerged as preferable alternatives to surgical ligation for treatment of CBS. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study periprocedural complications and outcomes of CBS patients treated with coil embolization and covered stents.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified studies that reported outcomes of endovascular treatment of CBS published from 2000 to April 2016. Outcomes included technical success, postoperative rebleeding, survival time, and perioperative complications. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five noncomparative studies with 559 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rate was 100% in both coiling and covered stenting groups. Median survival time was 3 months (range, 0-96 months) for all CBS patients. Overall perioperative mortality was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-17%). Postoperative rebleeding rate was 27% (95% CI, 19%-367%). Perioperative stroke and infection rates were 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) and 1% (95% CI, 0%-5%), respectively. At last follow-up, 39% of patients were alive (95% CI, 29%-48%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coil embolization and stent grafts may both be safe treatment options for CBS with few perioperative complications and high rates of technical success, but prognosis after treatment remains poor. In general, noncomparative studies do not demonstrate differences between the two techniques with respect to periprocedural complications and patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

颈动脉破裂综合征(CBS)是头颈癌和放射治疗的一种危及生命的并发症。血管内技术已成为治疗CBS的手术结扎的首选替代方法。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究接受线圈栓塞和覆膜支架治疗的CBS患者的围手术期并发症和结局。

方法

全面的文献检索确定了报告2000年至2016年4月期间CBS血管内治疗结局的研究。结局包括技术成功率、术后再出血、生存时间和围手术期并发症。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了25项非对照研究,共559例患者。线圈栓塞组和覆膜支架组的技术成功率均为100%。所有CBS患者的中位生存时间为3个月(范围0-96个月)。总体围手术期死亡率为11%(95%置信区间[CI],5%-17%)。术后再出血率为27%(95%CI,19%-36%)。围手术期卒中率和感染率分别为3%(95%CI,1%-6%)和1%(95%CI,0%-5%)。在最后一次随访时,39%的患者存活(95%CI,29%-48%)。

结论

线圈栓塞和支架植入术对于CBS可能都是安全的治疗选择,围手术期并发症少且技术成功率高,但治疗后的预后仍然很差。一般来说,非对照研究未显示这两种技术在围手术期并发症和患者结局方面存在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验