May Keenan R, Walker Bruce N
Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta GA 30332, United States.
Appl Ergon. 2017 May;61:144-158. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
Bone conduction headphones are devices that transmit sound through the bones of a listener's head rather than through the air in their outer ear. They have been marketed as a safer way to enjoy audio content while walking, jogging, or cycling. However, listening to distracting sounds over bone conduction may still disrupt a listener's awareness of their auditory environment. The present study investigated the nature of this interference with the faculty of sound source localization-a key prerequisite for generating situation awareness through audio. Participants sat in the middle of a circle of loudspeakers and listened for target sounds played from different directions. Each time they heard a sound, they responded by indicating what direction they judged the sound to have come from. Meanwhile, participants listened to distractor sounds played through bone conduction headphones. Participants heard (1) no distractor sounds, (2) a spoken story that they were instructed to ignore, and (3) the same spoken story that they were instructed to attend to. For conditions (2) and (3), some participants heard a version of the story with background music, while others heard the spoken story without the music. Participants had greater localization error in the distractor-present conditions. Additionally, participants who heard the spoken story with music exhibited greater localization error. However, there was no effect of whether participants ignored or attended to distractors. This pattern was attributed to masking effects, and was more pronounced for narrow-band targets compared to broadband targets. Post-hoc analyses found evidence of a 'pulling' effect, in which localization judgments were systematically biased toward the apparent direction of the bone conducted distractors. These results indicate that using bone conduction headphones can be expected to cause a decline in a person's awareness of their environment, in a subtle way that a jogger or cyclist might not be actively aware of, even if their attention is directed to the environment and environmental sounds are readily detectible.
骨传导耳机是一种通过听众头部的骨骼而非外耳中的空气来传输声音的设备。它们被宣传为在步行、慢跑或骑自行车时享受音频内容的更安全方式。然而,通过骨传导收听干扰性声音仍可能会扰乱听众对其听觉环境的感知。本研究调查了这种干扰对声源定位能力的影响——这是通过音频生成态势感知的关键前提。参与者坐在一圈扬声器中间,聆听从不同方向播放的目标声音。每次他们听到声音时,就通过指出他们判断声音来自的方向来做出反应。与此同时,参与者通过骨传导耳机收听干扰性声音。参与者听到(1)无干扰性声音,(2)一个他们被指示忽略的有声故事,以及(3)同一个他们被指示留意的有声故事。对于条件(2)和(3),一些参与者听到的故事版本带有背景音乐,而另一些参与者听到的是没有音乐的有声故事。在有干扰物存在的条件下,参与者的定位误差更大。此外,听到带有音乐的有声故事的参与者表现出更大的定位误差。然而,参与者是否忽略或留意干扰物并没有产生影响。这种模式归因于掩蔽效应,与宽带目标相比,窄带目标的这种效应更为明显。事后分析发现了一种“拉动”效应的证据,即定位判断会系统性地偏向骨传导干扰物的表观方向。这些结果表明,使用骨传导耳机可能会导致一个人对其环境的感知能力下降,这种方式很微妙,即使慢跑者或骑自行车的人将注意力指向环境且环境声音很容易被察觉,他们可能也不会主动意识到。