Suppr超能文献

开发并现场测试一款决策支持工具,以促进避孕咨询中的共享决策。

Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.

机构信息

Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco,1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco,1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco,1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We developed and formatively evaluated a tablet-based decision support tool for use by women prior to a contraceptive counseling visit to help them engage in shared decision making regarding method selection.

METHODS

Drawing upon formative work around women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and conceptual understanding of health care decision making, we iteratively developed a storyboard and then digital prototypes, based on best practices for decision support tool development. Pilot testing using both quantitative and qualitative data and cognitive testing was conducted. We obtained feedback from patient and provider advisory groups throughout the development process.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of women who used the tool in pilot testing reported that it helped them choose a method, and qualitative interviews indicated acceptability of the tool's content and presentation. Compared to the control group, women who used the tool demonstrated trends toward increased likelihood of complete satisfaction with their method. Participant responses to cognitive testing were used in tool refinement.

CONCLUSION

Our decision support tool appears acceptable to women in the family planning setting.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Formative evaluation of the tool supports its utility among patients making contraceptive decisions, which can be further evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

摘要

目的

我们开发了一种基于平板电脑的决策支持工具,供女性在避孕咨询就诊前使用,以帮助她们就方法选择进行共同决策。

方法

我们借鉴了有关女性对避孕咨询偏好的形成性工作以及对医疗保健决策的概念理解,根据决策支持工具开发的最佳实践,迭代开发了故事板,然后是数字原型。我们使用定量和定性数据以及认知测试进行了试点测试。在整个开发过程中,我们从患者和提供者咨询小组获得了反馈。

结果

在试点测试中使用该工具的 96%的女性表示,该工具帮助她们选择了一种方法,定性访谈表明该工具的内容和呈现方式是可以接受的。与对照组相比,使用该工具的女性在对其方法完全满意的可能性方面表现出增加的趋势。参与者对认知测试的反应用于工具的改进。

结论

我们的决策支持工具在计划生育环境中似乎被女性接受。

实践意义

该工具的形成性评估支持其在做出避孕决策的患者中的实用性,这可以在随机对照试验中进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
2
Development and conceptual validation of a questionnaire to help contraceptive choice: CHLOE (Contraception: HeLping for wOmen's choicE).
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Aug;22(4):286-290. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1364719. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
Patient perceptions of a decision support tool to assist with young women's contraceptive choice.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.022. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Patient-provider communication before and after implementation of the contraceptive decision support tool My Birth Control.
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
6
More Than a Destination: Contraceptive Decision Making as a Journey.
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Cluster randomized trial of a patient-centered contraceptive decision support tool, My Birth Control.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):565.e1-565.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
10
Young Women's Perspectives About the Contraceptive Counseling Received During Their Emergency Contraception Visit.
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Mar-Apr;29(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Centred Counselling Tools for Dispensing Contraceptives in Community Pharmacy Settings: A Systematic Review.
Open Access J Contracept. 2024 Nov 30;15:119-133. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S487417. eCollection 2024.
2
Perceptions and Experiences With Healthcare Providers Among People Navigating Reproductive and Fertility Decisions.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241249405. doi: 10.1177/21501319241249405.
5
Barriers to person-centered service design in pharmacy practice: examples, lessons, and potential solutions.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):542-547. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01689-4. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
6
Strategies to improve interpersonal communication along the continuum of maternal and newborn care: A scoping review and narrative synthesis.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 11;3(10):e0002449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002449. eCollection 2023.
7
Can personalized digital counseling improve consumer search for modern contraceptive methods?
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 6;9(40):eadg4420. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg4420.
8
Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 2: Patient experiences.
PEC Innov. 2023 May 23;2:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100169. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
2
Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):78.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.173. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
3
Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods.
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
4
Adolescent and Young Women's Contraceptive Decision-Making Processes: Choosing "The Best Method for Her".
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Aug;28(4):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
5
The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):46.e1-46.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
6
"It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning.
Contraception. 2015 Feb;91(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
8
Factors influencing women's selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods after counselling in 11 countries: results from a subanalysis of the CHOICE study.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013 Oct;18(5):372-80. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.819077. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
9
Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013 Jun;18(3):181-90. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.777830. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
10
Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验