• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生育力意识的共同决策工具的评估 第2部分:患者体验。

Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 2: Patient experiences.

作者信息

Duane Marguerite, Martinez Virginia, Berry Meghan, Gilpatrick Sarah, Manhart Michael D

机构信息

FACTS, 1020 Kearny St NE, Washington, DC 20017, USA.

Fertility Science Institute, Couple to Couple League International, 5440 Moeller Avenue Suite 149, Cincinnati, OH 45212, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 May 23;2:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100169. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100169
PMID:37384150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294094/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient experiences using a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Tool for fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) of family planning.

METHODS

The study employed a prospective crossover design to evaluate impact of the SDM tool compared to usual practice when discussing FABMs with patients. Patients completed pre- and post-office visit surveys and an online survey six months later. The primary outcomes evaluated the effect of the SDM tool on patient satisfaction and FABM continuity of use rates.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in likelihood of changing family planning methods immediately after the office visit; however, by six months a significantly larger proportion of patients had started or changed FABMs in the experimental group (52%, 34/66) compared to the control group (36%, 24/66) ( = 0.04). Significantly more patients who used the tool and changed their FABM after their visit reported increased satisfaction with their FABM compared to control (50% vs. 17%,  = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the SDM tool increased persistent use of and satisfaction with chosen FABMs at six months.

INNOVATIONS

The novel SDM tool can enhance patients' understanding and facilitate the selection of a more suitable method leading to increased satisfaction.

摘要

目的

评估患者使用基于生育力意识的计划生育方法(FABMs)的共同决策(SDM)工具的体验。

方法

本研究采用前瞻性交叉设计,在与患者讨论FABMs时,评估SDM工具与常规做法相比的影响。患者在就诊前和就诊后完成调查问卷,并在六个月后完成在线调查。主要结局评估SDM工具对患者满意度和FABMs持续使用率的影响。

结果

就诊后立即改变计划生育方法的可能性没有显著差异;然而,到六个月时,与对照组(36%,24/66)相比,实验组(52%,34/66)中有显著更多的患者开始或改变了FABMs(P = 0.04)。与对照组相比,使用该工具并在就诊后改变其FABM的患者对其FABM的满意度显著更高(50%对17%,P = 0.022)。

结论

使用SDM工具可在六个月时提高对所选FABMs的持续使用率和满意度。

创新点

新型SDM工具可增强患者的理解,并有助于选择更合适的方法,从而提高满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f6/10294094/441c6b757471/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f6/10294094/0a5b17157149/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f6/10294094/441c6b757471/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f6/10294094/0a5b17157149/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f6/10294094/441c6b757471/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 2: Patient experiences.基于生育力意识的共同决策工具的评估 第2部分:患者体验。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 23;2:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100169. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge.基于生育意识的共同决策工具的评估 第1部分:研究设计及其对临床医生知识的影响
PEC Innov. 2022 Jun 28;1:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100061. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Use of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention Among Ghanaian Women: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey.加纳女性使用基于生育意识的方法避孕:一项全国代表性的横断面调查。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Jun 30;9(2):318-331. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00601.
4
5
Use of fertility awareness-based methods of contraception: Evidence from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2013-2017.生育力知晓避孕方法的使用:来自 2013-2017 年全国家庭增长调查的证据。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
6
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design.采用前后对照研究设计开发并测试一种用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中支架选择的个性化、循证共享决策工具。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005139. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005139.
7
Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning and Women's Health: Impact of an Online Elective.基于生育意识的计划生育方法和妇女健康:在线选修课程的影响。
Fam Med. 2024 Jul;56(7):414-421. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.562177. Epub 2024 May 23.
8
Medical Students' Knowledge of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning.医学生对基于生育意识的计划生育方法的了解。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;4:65. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00065. eCollection 2017.
9
Multiple contraceptive method use and prevalence of fertility awareness based method use in the United States, 2013-2015.美国 2013-2015 年多种避孕方法的使用和基于生育意识方法的使用流行率。
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):188-192. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
10
A Prospective Evaluation of Shared Decision-making Regarding Analgesics Selection for Older Emergency Department Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Pain.老年急性肌肉骨骼疼痛急诊科患者镇痛药选择共同决策的前瞻性评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):306-14. doi: 10.1111/acem.12888. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning and Women's Health: Impact of an Online Elective.基于生育意识的计划生育方法和妇女健康:在线选修课程的影响。
Fam Med. 2024 Jul;56(7):414-421. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.562177. Epub 2024 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge.基于生育意识的共同决策工具的评估 第1部分:研究设计及其对临床医生知识的影响
PEC Innov. 2022 Jun 28;1:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100061. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.基于生育意识的女性健康与计划生育方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 24;9:858977. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.858977. eCollection 2022.
3
A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States.
对美国第十类诊所中医疗服务提供者围绕基于生育意识的方法的知识、态度和实践的混合方法评估。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 15;1(1):354-365. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0065. eCollection 2020.
4
Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning.基于生育力认识的计划生育方法。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;66:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.003. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Patient Decision Aids to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.患者决策辅助工具在妇产科中促进共享决策的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):444-451. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003664.
6
A mixed-methods study of provider perspectives on My Birth Control: a contraceptive decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision making.一项关于提供者对 My Birth Control(一种旨在促进共同决策的避孕决策支持工具)看法的混合方法研究。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):420-423. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
7
Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.患者对避孕咨询的偏好:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):691-702. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006.
8
Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.开发并现场测试一款决策支持工具,以促进避孕咨询中的共享决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
Adolescent and Young Women's Contraceptive Decision-Making Processes: Choosing "The Best Method for Her".青少年及年轻女性的避孕决策过程:选择“最适合她的方法”
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Aug;28(4):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making.女性对避孕咨询和决策的偏好。
Contraception. 2013 Aug;88(2):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 21.