Nikolian Vahagn C, Kamdar Neil S, Regenbogen Scott E, Morris Arden M, Byrn John C, Suwanabol Pasithorn A, Campbell Darrell A, Hendren Samantha
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Surgery. 2017 Jun;161(6):1619-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.033. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
Anastomotic leak is a major source of morbidity in colorectal operations and has become an area of interest in performance metrics. It is unclear whether anastomotic leak is associated primarily with surgeons' technical performance or explained better by patient characteristics and institutional factors. We sought to establish if anastomotic leak could serve as a valid quality metric in colorectal operations by evaluating provider variation after adjusting for patient factors.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of colorectal resection patients in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. Clinically relevant patient and operative factors were tested for association with anastomotic leak. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to derive risk-adjusted rates of anastomotic leak.
Of 9,192 colorectal resections, 244 (2.7%) had a documented anastomotic leak. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 3.0% for patients with pelvic anastomoses and 2.5% for those with intra-abdominal anastomoses. Multivariable analysis showed that a greater operative duration, male sex, body mass index >30 kg/m, tobacco use, chronic immunosuppressive medications, thrombocytosis (platelet count >400 × 10/L), and urgent/emergency operations were independently associated with anastomotic leak (C-statistic = 0.75). After accounting for patient and procedural risk factors, 5 hospitals had a significantly greater incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak.
This population-based study shows that risk factors for anastomotic leak include male sex, obesity, tobacco use, immunosuppression, thrombocytosis, greater operative duration, and urgent/emergency operation; models including these factors predict most of the variation in anastomotic leak rates. This study suggests that anastomotic leak can serve as a valid metric that can identify opportunities for quality improvement.
吻合口漏是结直肠手术中发病的主要原因,并且已成为手术质量指标关注的领域。目前尚不清楚吻合口漏是否主要与外科医生的技术操作有关,还是可以更好地用患者特征和机构因素来解释。我们试图通过在调整患者因素后评估医疗服务提供者之间的差异,来确定吻合口漏是否可作为结直肠手术中有效的质量指标。
我们对密歇根外科质量协作组中的结直肠切除患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。测试了临床相关的患者和手术因素与吻合口漏的相关性。采用分层逻辑回归分析得出吻合口漏的风险调整率。
在9192例结直肠切除术中,有244例(2.7%)记录有吻合口漏。盆腔吻合患者的吻合口漏发生率为3.0%,腹腔内吻合患者为2.5%。多变量分析显示,手术时间延长、男性、体重指数>30kg/m²、吸烟、长期使用免疫抑制药物、血小板增多症(血小板计数>400×10⁹/L)以及急诊/紧急手术与吻合口漏独立相关(C统计量=0.75)。在考虑患者和手术风险因素后,5家医院术后吻合口漏的发生率显著更高。
这项基于人群的研究表明,吻合口漏的风险因素包括男性、肥胖、吸烟、免疫抑制、血小板增多症、手术时间延长以及急诊/紧急手术;包含这些因素的模型可预测吻合口漏发生率的大部分差异。本研究表明,吻合口漏可作为一个有效的指标,用于识别质量改进的机会。