• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。

A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

机构信息

From VU University Medical Center (H.J.B., C.L.D., G.A.A., M.A.C., M.H.G.M.P., E.S.M.L.-K.) and Amsterdam Medical Center (W.A.B.) - both in Amsterdam; Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona (A.M.L.); the Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden (J.A., E.A., E.H.); Herlev Hospital, Department of Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (J.R.); and Caritas Krankenhaus St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany (A.F.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1414882
PMID:25830422
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is widely used. However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outcomes in rectal cancer is lacking. A trial was designed to compare 3-year rates of cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area (locoregional recurrence) and survival after laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer.

METHODS

In this international trial conducted in 30 hospitals, we randomly assigned patients with a solitary adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm of the anal verge, not invading adjacent tissues, and without distant metastases to undergo either laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point was locoregional recurrence 3 years after the index surgery. Secondary end points included disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1044 patients were included (699 in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 345 in the open-surgery group). At 3 years, the locoregional recurrence rate was 5.0% in the two groups (difference, 0 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], -2.6 to 2.6). Disease-free survival rates were 74.8% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 70.8% in the open-surgery group (difference, 4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.9 to 9.9). Overall survival rates were 86.7% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 83.6% in the open-surgery group (difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 7.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer was associated with rates of locoregional recurrence and disease-free and overall survival similar to those for open surgery. (Funded by Ethicon Endo-Surgery Europe and others; COLOR II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297791.).

摘要

背景

腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术被广泛应用。然而,缺乏强有力的证据表明腹腔镜手术和开腹手术在直肠癌患者中具有相似的结果。本试验旨在比较腹腔镜和开腹直肠切除术 3 年盆腔或会阴部(局部复发)癌症复发率和生存情况。

方法

在这项在 30 家医院进行的国际试验中,我们将距离肛门 15cm 以内、未侵犯邻近组织且无远处转移的单一直肠腺癌患者按 2:1 的比例随机分配接受腹腔镜或开腹手术。主要终点为指数手术后 3 年的局部区域复发率。次要终点包括无病生存和总生存。

结果

共纳入 1044 例患者(腹腔镜手术组 699 例,开腹手术组 345 例)。3 年后,两组的局部区域复发率分别为 5.0%(差异为 0 个百分点;90%置信区间为 -2.6 至 2.6)。腹腔镜手术组的无病生存率为 74.8%,开腹手术组为 70.8%(差异为 4.0 个百分点;95%置信区间为 -1.9 至 9.9)。腹腔镜手术组的总生存率为 86.7%,开腹手术组为 83.6%(差异为 3.1 个百分点;95%置信区间为 -1.6 至 7.8)。

结论

腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的局部复发率以及无病生存和总生存率与开腹手术相似。(由 Ethicon Endo-Surgery Europe 等资助;COLOR II ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00297791。)

相似文献

1
A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌(COLOR II):一项随机、3 期临床试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
3
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放直肠癌根治术后无病生存和局部复发:澳大利亚腹腔镜直肠癌随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):596-602. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021.
4
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.124例未经挑选的患者接受腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1530-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y. Epub 2003 Jul 21.
5
The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.腹腔镜检查在直肠癌患者环周切缘阳性中的作用:单家高容量机构的长期结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Apr;25(2):129-37. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000060.
6
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放手术切除直肠癌对病理结局的影响:ALA-CART 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
7
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.
8
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2418-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0. Epub 2008 Apr 5.
9
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 II 期至 III 期直肠癌的无病生存和局部复发比较:ACOSOG Z6051 随机对照试验的随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002.
10
COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.COLOR II. 一项比较腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的随机临床试验。
Dan Med Bull. 2009 May;56(2):89-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助手术的短期和长期疗效
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Apr 16;9(5):1017-1028. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70024. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Animal study of adhesiolysis via transumbilical endoscopic surgery with gastric endoscopy: an exploration.经脐内镜手术联合胃镜进行粘连松解术的动物研究:一项探索
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04166-6.
3
The impact of uterine manipulator assistance on intraoperative exposure and outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
子宫操纵器辅助对腹腔镜直肠癌手术中术野暴露及手术结局的影响
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03078-2.
4
The articulated laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (ATOME trial): a single-arm, prospective trial with pre-specified comparison to robotic surgery.用于直肠癌的关节式腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(ATOME试验):一项单臂前瞻性试验,并预先设定与机器人手术进行比较。
Trials. 2025 Jul 28;26(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08847-1.
5
Survival Analysis Using Neoadjuvant Rectal Score in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: An Ambispective Study.在接受新辅助放化疗后接受手术的局部晚期直肠癌患者中使用新辅助直肠评分进行生存分析:一项双向研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):e86859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86859. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.美国结直肠癌治疗全程中的黑人和白人差异。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41575-025-01087-3.
7
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectal Resection-Experience of a Tertiary Oncology Center.手辅助腹腔镜直肠癌切除术——一家三级肿瘤中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 10;14(12):4097. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124097.
8
Robotic vs Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: The REAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌:REAL随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.8123.
9
Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Paradigm Shift.结直肠癌微创手术的进展:一种范式转变。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 May 1;26(5):1479-1481. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.5.1479.
10
Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of da Vinci SP and Single-Site Platforms.机器人辅助左半结肠癌切除术:达芬奇SP系统与单孔平台的比较
Int J Med Robot. 2025 Jun;21(3):e70079. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70079.