• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正式与非正式学习以及一年级心理学专业学生科学思维的发展:一项两阶段面板研究。

Formal and Informal Learning and First-Year Psychology Students' Development of Scientific Thinking: A Two-Wave Panel Study.

作者信息

Soyyılmaz Demet, Griffin Laura M, Martín Miguel H, Kucharský Šimon, Peycheva Ekaterina D, Vaupotič Nina, Edelsbrunner Peter A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Istanbul Bilgi University Istanbul, Turkey.

Faculty of Film, Art and Creative Technologies, Dún Laoghaire Institute of Art, Design and Technology Dún Laoghaire, Ireland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 10;8:133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00133. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00133
PMID:28239363
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5301459/
Abstract

Scientific thinking is a predicate for scientific inquiry, and thus important to develop early in psychology students as potential future researchers. The present research is aimed at fathoming the contributions of formal and informal learning experiences to psychology students' development of scientific thinking during their 1st-year of study. We hypothesize that informal experiences are relevant beyond formal experiences. First-year psychology student cohorts from various European countries will be assessed at the beginning and again at the end of the second semester. Assessments of scientific thinking will include scientific reasoning skills, the understanding of basic statistics concepts, and epistemic cognition. Formal learning experiences will include engagement in academic activities which are guided by university authorities. Informal learning experiences will include non-compulsory, self-guided learning experiences. Formal and informal experiences will be assessed with a newly developed survey. As dispositional predictors, students' need for cognition and self-efficacy in psychological science will be assessed. In a structural equation model, students' learning experiences and personal dispositions will be examined as predictors of their development of scientific thinking. Commonalities and differences in predictive weights across universities will be tested. The project is aimed at contributing information for designing university environments to optimize the development of students' scientific thinking.

摘要

科学思维是科学探究的一个前提条件,因此对于心理学专业的学生而言,作为未来潜在的研究者,尽早培养科学思维非常重要。本研究旨在探究正式和非正式学习经历对心理学专业学生在第一年学习期间科学思维发展的贡献。我们假设非正式经历比正式经历更具相关性。来自欧洲不同国家的一年级心理学学生群体将在第二学期开始时和结束时分别接受评估。科学思维的评估将包括科学推理能力、对基本统计学概念的理解以及认知认识论。正式学习经历将包括参与由大学管理部门指导的学术活动。非正式学习经历将包括非强制性的、自主学习经历。正式和非正式经历将通过一项新开发的调查进行评估。作为倾向性预测指标,将评估学生在心理科学方面的认知需求和自我效能感。在一个结构方程模型中,将把学生的学习经历和个人倾向作为其科学思维发展的预测指标进行检验。将测试不同大学在预测权重方面的共性和差异。该项目旨在为设计大学环境提供信息,以优化学生科学思维的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/4f6e17b2f1d8/fpsyg-08-00133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/3c254a3dacf8/fpsyg-08-00133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/24f314949f7e/fpsyg-08-00133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/4f6e17b2f1d8/fpsyg-08-00133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/3c254a3dacf8/fpsyg-08-00133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/24f314949f7e/fpsyg-08-00133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/5301459/4f6e17b2f1d8/fpsyg-08-00133-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Formal and Informal Learning and First-Year Psychology Students' Development of Scientific Thinking: A Two-Wave Panel Study.正式与非正式学习以及一年级心理学专业学生科学思维的发展:一项两阶段面板研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 10;8:133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00133. eCollection 2017.
2
Students' perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience.学生参与暑期非正式学习体验后对STEM学习的认知
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
Medical Student Progress Examination Performance and Its Relationship With Metacognition, Critical Thinking, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies.医学生进展考试表现及其与元认知、批判性思维和自我调节学习策略的关系。
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):278-284. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003766.
4
Student-Driven Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CUREs) Projects in Identifying Vaginal Microorganism Species Communities to Promote Scientific Literacy Skills.以学生为主体的基于课程的本科研究体验 (CUREs) 项目在识别阴道微生物物种群落方面的应用,以促进科学素养技能。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;10:870301. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870301. eCollection 2022.
5
Medical Students' Perceptions and Use of Formal and Informal Curriculum Resources.医学生对正式和非正式课程资源的认知与使用
Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52454. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52454. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Developing the critical thinking skills of astrobiology students through creative and scientific inquiry.通过创造性和科学性探究培养天体生物学专业学生的批判性思维能力。
Astrobiology. 2015 Jan;15(1):89-99. doi: 10.1089/ast.2014.1219. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
A social network perspective on peer relationship formation of medical undergraduates within large-scale learning communities.从社交网络角度探讨医学生在大规模学习社区中同伴关系的形成。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2162253. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2162253.
8
Designing museum exhibits to support the development of scientific thinking in informal learning environments: A university-museum-community partnership.设计博物馆展览以支持非正式学习环境中科学思维的发展:大学-博物馆-社区伙伴关系。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2024;66:169-195. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
Impacts of university lockdown during the coronavirus pandemic on college students' academic achievement and critical thinking: A longitudinal study.新冠疫情期间大学封锁对大学生学业成绩和批判性思维的影响:一项纵向研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:995784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995784. eCollection 2022.
10
Visualising the invisible: a network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning.可视化无形之物:揭示学生学习非正式社交面的网络方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Dec;17(5):743-57. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9349-0.

本文引用的文献

1
How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list.如何在八个简单步骤中成为贝叶斯主义者:一份带注释的阅读清单。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):219-234. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5.
2
Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence.贝叶斯因子设计分析:为有力证据进行规划。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):128-142. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y.
3
The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals.对置信区间寄予信任的谬误。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):103-23. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8.
4
Teaching critical thinking.教授批判性思维。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):11199-204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505329112. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
5
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?《心理科学中可重复性问题特刊编辑引言:信心危机?》
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):528-30. doi: 10.1177/1745691612465253.
6
Correlation, necessity, and sufficiency: Common errors in the scientific reasoning of undergraduate students for interpreting experiments.相关性、必要性和充分性:本科生在解释实验的科学推理中的常见错误。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;43(5):305-15. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20879. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals.对置信区间的严重误解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1157-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3.
8
Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance.直面斯库拉和卡律布狄斯:标量、部分和近似测量不变性新可能性的比较。
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 23;4:770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770. eCollection 2013.
9
Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance.神经科学中交互作用的错误分析:一个重要的问题。
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Aug 26;14(9):1105-7. doi: 10.1038/nn.2886.
10
Educational interventions to advance children's scientific thinking.促进儿童科学思维的教育干预措施。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):971-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1204528.