Suppr超能文献

钆乙氧基苄基二乙三胺五乙酸增强肝脏动态磁共振成像中使用团注测试和团注追踪技术对肝动脉期时间及图像质量的比较

Comparison of the Timing of Hepatic Arterial Phase and Image Quality Using Test-Bolus and Bolus-Tracking Techniques in Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid-Enhanced Hepatic Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

作者信息

Iyama Yuji, Nakaura Takeshi, Yokoyama Koichi, Kidoh Masafumi, Utsunomiya Daisuke, Oda Seitaro, Namimoto Tomohiro, Yamashita Yasuyuki

机构信息

From the *Diagnostic Radiology, Amakusa Medical Center; and †Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical, Kumamoto University, Amakusa, Japan.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Jul/Aug;41(4):638-643. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000583.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality, the degree of artifacts and the percentage of timing of the optimal hepatic arterial phase (HAP) between test-bolus and bolus-tracking methods on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

In this prospective study, 60 patients who underwent 3-dimensional dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic 3-T MRI were enrolled in this study. We randomly assigned the 30 patients to the bolus-tracking method, and another 30 patients to the test-bolus method. Signal-to-noise ratios of the liver and spleen in HAP were compared in the 2 groups. Two radiologists independently assessed the ratio of optimal timing of HAP and the degree of ringing and motion artifacts of the 2 protocols.

RESULTS

The signal-to-noise ratios of the liver (24.0 [SD, 6.4] vs 20.4 [SD, 4.0]) and spleen (30.0 [SD, 13.3] vs 23.6 [SD, 9.9]) were significantly higher in the test-bolus protocol than in the bolus-tracking protocol. The ratio of optimal timing was also significantly higher with the test-bolus protocol than with the bolus-tracking protocol (76.7% vs 40.0%). The degree of ringing and motion artifacts of test-bolus protocol was significantly lower than that of the bolus-tracking protocol (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The test-bolus protocol in dynamic 3-T MRI can yield better qualitative image quality and more optimal timing of HAP images, while reducing the degree of artifacts compared with the bolus-tracking protocol.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较钆塞酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强磁共振成像(MRI)中,团注试验法与团注追踪法在肝脏动脉期(HAP)的图像质量、伪影程度及最佳时相百分比。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入60例行三维动态Gd-EOB-DTPA增强肝脏3-T MRI检查的患者。我们将30例患者随机分配至团注追踪法组,另外30例患者分配至团注试验法组。比较两组HAP中肝脏和脾脏的信噪比。两名放射科医生独立评估两种方案的HAP最佳时相比例以及振铃和运动伪影程度。

结果

团注试验法方案中肝脏(24.0[标准差,6.4]对20.4[标准差,4.0])和脾脏(30.0[标准差,13.3]对23.6[标准差,9.9])的信噪比显著高于团注追踪法方案。团注试验法方案的最佳时相比例也显著高于团注追踪法方案(76.7%对40.0%)。团注试验法方案的振铃和运动伪影程度显著低于团注追踪法方案(P<0.01)。

结论

与团注追踪法方案相比,动态3-T MRI中的团注试验法方案可产生更好的定性图像质量和更优化的HAP图像时相,同时降低伪影程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a09/5516670/de5bc2e6c9e7/rct-41-638-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验