Iyama Yuji, Nakaura Takeshi, Yokoyama Koichi, Kidoh Masafumi, Utsunomiya Daisuke, Oda Seitaro, Namimoto Tomohiro, Yamashita Yasuyuki
From the *Diagnostic Radiology, Amakusa Medical Center; and †Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical, Kumamoto University, Amakusa, Japan.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Jul/Aug;41(4):638-643. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000583.
The aim of this study was to compare the image quality, the degree of artifacts and the percentage of timing of the optimal hepatic arterial phase (HAP) between test-bolus and bolus-tracking methods on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
In this prospective study, 60 patients who underwent 3-dimensional dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic 3-T MRI were enrolled in this study. We randomly assigned the 30 patients to the bolus-tracking method, and another 30 patients to the test-bolus method. Signal-to-noise ratios of the liver and spleen in HAP were compared in the 2 groups. Two radiologists independently assessed the ratio of optimal timing of HAP and the degree of ringing and motion artifacts of the 2 protocols.
The signal-to-noise ratios of the liver (24.0 [SD, 6.4] vs 20.4 [SD, 4.0]) and spleen (30.0 [SD, 13.3] vs 23.6 [SD, 9.9]) were significantly higher in the test-bolus protocol than in the bolus-tracking protocol. The ratio of optimal timing was also significantly higher with the test-bolus protocol than with the bolus-tracking protocol (76.7% vs 40.0%). The degree of ringing and motion artifacts of test-bolus protocol was significantly lower than that of the bolus-tracking protocol (P < 0.01).
The test-bolus protocol in dynamic 3-T MRI can yield better qualitative image quality and more optimal timing of HAP images, while reducing the degree of artifacts compared with the bolus-tracking protocol.
本研究旨在比较钆塞酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强磁共振成像(MRI)中,团注试验法与团注追踪法在肝脏动脉期(HAP)的图像质量、伪影程度及最佳时相百分比。
在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入60例行三维动态Gd-EOB-DTPA增强肝脏3-T MRI检查的患者。我们将30例患者随机分配至团注追踪法组,另外30例患者分配至团注试验法组。比较两组HAP中肝脏和脾脏的信噪比。两名放射科医生独立评估两种方案的HAP最佳时相比例以及振铃和运动伪影程度。
团注试验法方案中肝脏(24.0[标准差,6.4]对20.4[标准差,4.0])和脾脏(30.0[标准差,13.3]对23.6[标准差,9.9])的信噪比显著高于团注追踪法方案。团注试验法方案的最佳时相比例也显著高于团注追踪法方案(76.7%对40.0%)。团注试验法方案的振铃和运动伪影程度显著低于团注追踪法方案(P<0.01)。
与团注追踪法方案相比,动态3-T MRI中的团注试验法方案可产生更好的定性图像质量和更优化的HAP图像时相,同时降低伪影程度。