• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我关联性优先确保视觉意识的获取。

Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness.

作者信息

Macrae C Neil, Visokomogilski Aleksandar, Golubickis Marius, Cunningham William A, Sahraie Arash

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen.

School of Psychology, University of Toronto.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):438-443. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000361.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000361
PMID:28240929
Abstract

As we are cognizant of only a fraction of the available visual inputs at any given time, how is information selected for access to consciousness? In particular, does the personal significance of stimuli influence perceptual selection? Given that self-relevant information is prioritized during various stages of processing, here we hypothesized that self-association may privilege access to awareness under continuous flash suppression (CFS). The results supported this prediction. Compared with geometric shapes referenced to either a friend or stranger, those previously associated with self were prioritized in visual awareness. To establish the basis of this effect, the processes underlying task performance were investigated using a hierarchical drift diffusion model approach. These analyses showed that self-prioritization mapped onto both the decisional (i.e., starting value, ) and nondecisional (i.e., ₀) parameters of the diffusion model. The implications of these findings are considered. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

由于在任何给定时间我们只能感知到一小部分可用的视觉输入,那么信息是如何被选择以进入意识的呢?特别是,刺激的个人意义会影响知觉选择吗?鉴于与自我相关的信息在处理的各个阶段都被优先处理,我们在此假设,在持续闪光抑制(CFS)下,自我关联可能会优先进入意识。结果支持了这一预测。与参照朋友或陌生人的几何形状相比,那些先前与自我相关联的形状在视觉意识中被优先处理。为了确定这种效应的基础,我们使用分层漂移扩散模型方法研究了任务表现背后的过程。这些分析表明,自我优先处理映射到扩散模型的决策参数(即起始值)和非决策参数(即₀)上。我们考虑了这些发现的意义。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness.自我关联性优先确保视觉意识的获取。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):438-443. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000361.
2
Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases.探索自我所有权效应:区分刺激偏差和反应偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):295-306. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000455. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization.自我的一部分:身份相关性调节自我优先化。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.工作记忆负荷与回溯线索效应:一种扩散模型解释
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Feb;44(2):286-310. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000448. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Working memory biasing of visual perception without awareness.无意识状态下视觉感知的工作记忆偏向
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):2051-62. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0566-2.
6
Self-prioritization and perceptual matching: The effects of temporal construal.自我优先排序与感知匹配:时间构想的影响
Mem Cognit. 2017 Oct;45(7):1223-1239. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0722-3.
7
Can perceptual grouping unfold in the absence of awareness? Comparing grouping during continuous flash suppression and sandwich masking.知觉分组能在无意识的情况下展开吗?比较连续闪光抑制和三明治掩蔽过程中的分组情况。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Apr;60:37-51. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Information matching the content of visual working memory is prioritized for conscious access.与视觉工作记忆内容相匹配的信息被优先用于意识访问。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2472-80. doi: 10.1177/0956797613495882. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Conscious Access to Suppressed Threatening Information Is Modulated by Working Memory.意识访问被压抑的威胁信息受到工作记忆的调节。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;27(11):1419-1427. doi: 10.1177/0956797616660680. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Seeing without knowing: task relevance dissociates between visual awareness and recognition.视而不知:任务相关性在视觉意识与识别之间产生分离。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:125-37. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12673. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital selfie editing shows sex specific associations between processing biases and life satisfaction.数字自拍编辑显示了处理偏差与生活满意度之间的性别特异性关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99056-y.
2
A multiverse assessment of the reliability of the self-matching task as a measurement of the self-prioritization effect.作为自我优先效应测量手段的自我匹配任务可靠性的多宇宙评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 2;57(1):37. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02538-6.
3
Temporal Properties of Self-Prioritization.自我优先级排序的时间特性。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Mar 9;26(3):242. doi: 10.3390/e26030242.
4
Self-prioritization in working memory gating.工作记忆门控中的自我优先级设定
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):399-414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02869-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
How far can the self be extended? Automatic attention capture is triggered not only by the self-face.自我能扩展到多远?自动注意捕获不仅由自我面孔触发。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1279653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279653. eCollection 2023.
6
Reward-related self-agency is disturbed in depression and anxiety.奖励相关的自我归因在抑郁和焦虑中受到干扰。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282727. eCollection 2023.
7
Self-Prioritization Reconsidered: Scrutinizing Three Claims.自我优先性再思考:审视三个主张
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jul;18(4):876-886. doi: 10.1177/17456916221131273. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?实验诱导的自我联想是否会引起情感上的自我优先化?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jun;76(6):1379-1390. doi: 10.1177/17470218221124928. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Self-relevance and the activation of attentional networks.自我相关性与注意网络的激活。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 May;76(5):1120-1130. doi: 10.1177/17470218221112238. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
10
The self and a close-other: differences between processing of faces and newly acquired information.自我与亲近他人:面孔与新获取信息加工的差异。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Feb 20;33(5):2183-2199. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac201.