Rosenthal Adam N, Fraser Lindsay S M, Philpott Susan, Manchanda Ranjit, Burnell Matthew, Badman Philip, Hadwin Richard, Rizzuto Ivana, Benjamin Elizabeth, Singh Naveena, Evans D Gareth, Eccles Diana M, Ryan Andy, Liston Robert, Dawnay Anne, Ford Jeremy, Gunu Richard, Mackay James, Skates Steven J, Menon Usha, Jacobs Ian J
Adam N. Rosenthal, Lindsay S.M. Fraser, Susan Philpott, Ranjit Manchanda, Matthew Burnell, Philip Badman, Richard Hadwin, Ivana Rizzuto, Andy Ryan, Robert Liston, Jeremy Ford, Richard Gunu, Usha Menon, and Ian J. Jacobs, University College London Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health; Elizabeth Benjamin, University College London; Naveena Singh, Barts Health National Health Service Trust; Ranjit Manchanda, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London; Anne Dawnay, University College London Hospital; James Mackay, The University College London Cancer Institute, London; D. Gareth Evans, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital Manchester, Manchester; Diana M. Eccles, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Ian J. Jacobs, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Purpose To establish the performance of screening with serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), interpreted using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA), and transvaginal sonography (TVS) for women at high risk of ovarian cancer (OC) or fallopian tube cancer (FTC). Patients and Methods Women whose estimated lifetime risk of OC/FTC was ≥ 10% were recruited at 42 centers in the United Kingdom and underwent ROCA screening every 4 months. TVS occurred annually if ROCA results were normal or within 2 months of an abnormal ROCA result. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) was encouraged throughout the study. Participants were observed via cancer registries, questionnaires, and notification by centers. Performance was calculated after censoring 365 days after prior screen, with modeling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. Results Between June 14, 2007, and May 15, 2012, 4,348 women underwent 13,728 women-years of screening. The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. Nineteen patients were diagnosed with invasive OC/FTC within 1 year of prior screening (13 diagnoses were screen-detected and six were occult at RRSO). No symptomatic interval cancers occurred. Ten (52.6%) of the total 19 diagnoses were stage I to II OC/FTC (CI, 28.9% to 75.6%). Of the 13 screen-detected cancers, five (38.5%) were stage I to II (CI, 13.9% to 68.4%). Of the six occult cancers, five (83.3%) were stage I to II (CI, 35.9% to 99.6%). Modeled sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for OC/FTC detection within 1 year were 94.7% (CI, 74.0% to 99.9%), 10.8% (6.5% to 16.5%), and 100% (CI, 100% to 100%), respectively. Seven (36.8%) of the 19 cancers diagnosed < 1 year after prior screen were stage IIIb to IV (CI, 16.3% to 61.6%) compared with 17 (94.4%) of 18 cancers diagnosed > 1 year after screening ended (CI, 72.7% to 99.9%; P < .001). Eighteen (94.8%) of 19 cancers diagnosed < 1 year after prior screen had zero residual disease (with lower surgical complexity, P = .16) (CI, 74.0% to 99.9%) compared with 13 (72.2%) of 18 cancers subsequently diagnosed (CI, 46.5% to 90.3%; P = .09). Conclusion ROCA-based screening is an option for women at high risk of OC/FTC who defer or decline RRSO, given its high sensitivity and significant stage shift. However, it remains unknown whether this strategy would improve survival in screened high-risk women.
目的 评估采用血清癌抗原125(CA-125)检测,并结合卵巢癌风险评估算法(ROCA)解读,以及经阴道超声检查(TVS),对卵巢癌(OC)或输卵管癌(FTC)高危女性进行筛查的效果。患者与方法 在英国42个中心招募OC/FTC终生风险估计≥10%的女性,每4个月进行一次ROCA筛查。若ROCA结果正常,或ROCA结果异常后2个月内进行TVS检查。在整个研究过程中鼓励行降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)。通过癌症登记、问卷调查及各中心报告对参与者进行观察。在对上次筛查后365天进行审查后计算筛查效果,并对RRSO时检测到的隐匿性癌症进行建模。结果 2007年6月14日至2012年5月15日,4348名女性接受了13728人年的筛查。中位随访时间为4.8年。19名患者在末次筛查后1年内被诊断为浸润性OC/FTC(13例为筛查发现,6例为RRSO时隐匿性发现)。未出现有症状的间期癌。19例诊断中,10例(52.6%)为Ⅰ至Ⅱ期OC/FTC(可信区间,28.9%至75.6%)。在13例筛查发现的癌症中,5例(38.5%)为Ⅰ至Ⅱ期(可信区间,13.9%至68.4%)。在6例隐匿性癌症中,5例(83.3%)为Ⅰ至Ⅱ期(可信区间,35.9%至99.6%)。OC/FTC在1年内检测的建模敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.7%(可信区间,74.0%至99.9%)、10.8%(6.5%至16.5%)和100%(可信区间,100%至100%)。在末次筛查后<1年诊断的19例癌症中,7例(36.8%)为Ⅲb至Ⅳ期(可信区间,16.3%至61.6%),而在筛查结束后>1年诊断的18例癌症中,17例(94.4%)为Ⅲb至Ⅳ期(可信区间,72.7%至99.9%;P<.001)。在末次筛查后<1年诊断的19例癌症中,18例(94.8%)无残留疾病(手术复杂性较低,P = 0.16)(可信区间,74.0%至99.9%),而随后诊断的18例癌症中,13例(72.2%)无残留疾病(可信区间,46.5%至90.3%;P = 0.09)。结论 鉴于基于ROCA的筛查具有高敏感性和显著的分期转移,对于推迟或拒绝RRSO的OC/FTC高危女性是一种选择。然而,该策略是否能提高筛查的高危女性的生存率仍不清楚。