Schmidt Robert, Berke Joshua D
Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK
Department of Neurology and Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 19;372(1718). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0202.
Many studies have implicated the basal ganglia in the suppression of action impulses ('stopping'). Here, we discuss recent neurophysiological evidence that distinct hypothesized processes involved in action preparation and cancellation can be mapped onto distinct basal ganglia cell types and pathways. We examine how movement-related activity in the striatum is related to a 'Go' process and how going may be modulated by brief epochs of beta oscillations. We then describe how, rather than a unitary 'Stop' process, there appear to be separate, complementary 'Pause' and 'Cancel' mechanisms. We discuss the implications of these stopping subprocesses for the interpretation of the stop-signal reaction time-in particular, some activity that seems too slow to causally contribute to stopping when assuming a single Stop processes may actually be fast enough under a Pause-then-Cancel model. Finally, we suggest that combining complementary neural mechanisms that emphasize speed or accuracy respectively may serve more generally to optimize speed-accuracy trade-offs.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
许多研究表明基底神经节参与了对动作冲动的抑制(“停止”)。在此,我们讨论最近的神经生理学证据,即参与动作准备和取消的不同假设过程可映射到不同的基底神经节细胞类型和通路。我们研究纹状体中与运动相关的活动如何与“执行”过程相关,以及执行如何受到短暂的β振荡时期的调节。然后我们描述,似乎并不存在单一的“停止”过程,而是存在独立且互补的“暂停”和“取消”机制。我们讨论这些停止子过程对停止信号反应时间解释的影响——特别是,在假设单一停止过程时,某些活动似乎太慢而无法对停止产生因果作用,但在“暂停然后取消”模型下实际上可能足够快。最后,我们认为结合分别强调速度或准确性的互补神经机制可能更普遍地有助于优化速度 - 准确性权衡。本文是主题为“运动抑制:停止和静止的脑机制”特刊的一部分。