Molenaar Heike, Glawe Martin, Boehm Robert, Piepho Hans-Peter
University of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science, Biostatistics Unit , Stuttgart 70599, Germany.
Klemm+Sohn GmbH & Co. KG , Stuttgart 70378, Germany.
Hortic Res. 2017 Feb 22;4:17004. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2017.4. eCollection 2017.
Ornamental plant variety improvement is limited by current phenotyping approaches and neglected use of experimental designs. The present study was conducted to show the benefits of using an experimental design and corresponding analysis in ornamental breeding regarding simulated response to selection in for production-related traits. This required establishment of phenotyping protocols for root formation and stem cutting counts, with which 974 genotypes were assessed in a two-phase experimental design. The present paper evaluates this protocol. The possibility of varietal improvement through indirect selection on secondary traits such as branch count and flower count was assessed by genetic correlations. Simulated response to selection varied greatly, depending on the genotypic variances of the breeding population and traits. A varietal improvement of over 20% is possible for stem cutting count, root formation, branch count and flower count. In contrast, indirect selection of stem cutting count by branch count or flower count was found to be ineffective. The established phenotypic protocols and two-phase experimental designs are valuable tools for breeding of .
观赏植物品种改良受到当前表型分析方法的限制,且对实验设计的运用不足。本研究旨在展示在观赏植物育种中使用实验设计及相应分析对于生产相关性状模拟选择响应的益处。这需要建立根系形成和茎插条数量的表型分析方案,并在两阶段实验设计中对974个基因型进行评估。本文对该方案进行了评估。通过遗传相关性评估了通过对分枝数和花数等次要性状进行间接选择来改良品种的可能性。模拟选择响应差异很大,这取决于育种群体和性状的基因型方差。对于茎插条数量、根系形成、分枝数和花数,品种改良超过20%是可能的。相比之下,发现通过分枝数或花数间接选择茎插条数量是无效的。所建立的表型分析方案和两阶段实验设计是[具体植物名称缺失]育种的宝贵工具。