Suppr超能文献

利用自体荧光图像引导采样提高糖尿病足溃疡临床相关细菌的检出率。

Improved detection of clinically relevant wound bacteria using autofluorescence image-guided sampling in diabetic foot ulcers.

机构信息

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

MolecuLight, Inc., Toronto, Ontario Canada.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2017 Oct;14(5):833-841. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12717. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Abstract

Clinical wound assessment involves microbiological swabbing of wounds to identify and quantify bacterial species, and to determine microbial susceptibility to antibiotics. The Levine swabbing technique may be suboptimal because it samples only the wound bed, missing other diagnostically relevant areas of the wound, which may contain clinically significant bacteria. Thus, there is a clinical need to improve the reliability of microbiological wound sampling. To address this, a handheld portable autofluorescence (AF) imaging device that detects bacteria in real time, without contrast agents, was developed. Here, we report the results of a clinical study evaluating the use of real-time AF imaging to visualise bacteria in and around the wound bed and to guide swabbing during the clinical assessment of diabetic foot ulcers, compared with the Levine technique. We investigated 33 diabetic foot ulcers (n = 31 patients) and found that AF imaging more accurately identified the presence of moderate and/or heavy bacterial load compared with the Levine technique (accuracy 78% versus 52%, P = 0·048; adjusted diagnostic odds ratio 7·67, P < 0·00022 versus 3·07, P = 0·066) and maximised the effectiveness of bacterial load sampling, with no significant impact on clinical workflow. AF imaging may help clinicians better identify the wound areas with clinically significant bacteria, and maximise sampling of treatment-relevant pathogens.

摘要

临床伤口评估包括对伤口进行微生物拭子取样,以识别和定量细菌种类,并确定微生物对抗生素的敏感性。莱文拭子技术可能不够理想,因为它只取样伤口床,错过了伤口其他具有诊断意义的相关区域,而这些区域可能含有具有临床意义的细菌。因此,临床上需要提高微生物伤口取样的可靠性。为了解决这个问题,开发了一种手持式便携式自动荧光(AF)成像设备,可实时检测细菌,无需造影剂。在这里,我们报告了一项临床研究的结果,该研究评估了实时 AF 成像在可视化伤口床内和周围的细菌以及在糖尿病足溃疡的临床评估中指导拭子取样的用途,与莱文技术相比。我们研究了 33 例糖尿病足溃疡(n = 31 例患者),发现与莱文技术相比,AF 成像更准确地识别出中度和/或重度细菌负荷的存在(准确性为 78%对 52%,P = 0·048;调整后的诊断优势比为 7·67,P < 0·00022 对 3·07,P = 0·066),并最大限度地提高了细菌负荷取样的有效性,对临床工作流程没有显著影响。AF 成像可能有助于临床医生更好地识别具有临床意义的细菌的伤口区域,并最大限度地取样治疗相关的病原体。

相似文献

3
Efficacy of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device in an outpatient wound care clinic: a pilot study.
J Wound Care. 2019 Jul 2;28(7):438-443. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.7.438.
7
8
Use of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device: wound measurement, bacterial detection and targeted debridement.
J Wound Care. 2019 Dec 2;28(12):824-834. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.12.824.

引用本文的文献

1
Wound management materials and technologies from bench to bedside and beyond.
Nat Rev Mater. 2024 Aug;9(8):550-566. doi: 10.1038/s41578-024-00693-y. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Prospective evaluation of the Moleculight i:X™ in the early detection of driveline infections.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 29;40(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae215.
4
Non-invasive techniques for wound assessment: A comprehensive review.
Int Wound J. 2024 Nov;21(11):e70109. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70109.
6
Determination of the Course of Cyan Fluorescence of with a Handheld Bacterial Imaging Device.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(14):1474. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141474.
8
Current and Future Developments in Wound Healing.
Facial Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;39(5):477-488. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769936. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Lights, fluorescence, action-Influencing wound treatment plans including debridement of bacteria and biofilms.
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3279-3288. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14208. Epub 2023 May 3.
10
Use of fluorescence imaging to optimize location of tissue sampling in hard-to-heal wounds.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jan 12;12:1070311. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1070311. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

3
Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis.
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):880-91. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12399. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
4
Swab versus biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic infected wounds.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013 May;26(5):211-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000428984.58483.aa.
5
Does this patient have an infection of a chronic wound?
JAMA. 2012 Feb 8;307(6):605-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.98.
7
Molecular microbiology: new dimensions for cutaneous biology and wound healing.
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Jan;130(1):38-48. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.221.
8
Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 predicts poor wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):117-9. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0763. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
9
The lack of reliability of clinical examination in the diagnosis of wound infection: preliminary communication.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2008 Mar;7(1):32-5. doi: 10.1177/1534734607313984.
10
How precise is the evaluation of chronic wounds by health care professionals?
Int Wound J. 2007 Jun;4(2):156-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00334.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验