Reslan S, Kalpakjian C Z, Hanks R A, Millis S R, Bombardier C H
Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan School of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Spinal Cord. 2017 May;55(5):497-501. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.146. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
Cross-sectional.
The objective of the study is to examine whether alcohol use disorders should be conceptualized categorically as abuse and dependence as in the 'Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' 4th edition or on a single continuum with mild to severe category ratings as in the 'Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' 5th edition in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
United States of America.
Data from 379 individuals who sustained SCI either traumatically or non-traumatically after the age of 18 and were at least 1 year post injury. Rasch analyses used the alcohol abuse and dependence modules of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders Non-patient Edition (SCID-I/NP).
Fifty-seven percent (n=166) of the entire sample endorsed criteria for alcohol abuse, and 25% (n=65) endorsed criteria for alcohol dependence. Fit values were generally acceptable except for one item (for example, alcohol abuse criterion 2), suggesting that the items fit the expectation of unidimensionality. Examination of the principal components analysis did not provide support for unidimensionality. The item-person map illustrates poor targeting of items.
Alcohol abuse and dependence criterion appear to reflect a unidimensional construct, a finding that supports a single latent construct or factor consistent with the DSM-5 diagnostic model.
横断面研究。
本研究的目的是探讨脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的酒精使用障碍应像《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第4版那样分类为滥用和依赖,还是应像《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版那样采用从轻度到重度的单一连续类别评级。
美利坚合众国。
数据来自379名18岁后因创伤性或非创伤性原因导致脊髓损伤且受伤至少1年的个体。Rasch分析使用了针对DSM-IV-TR轴I障碍非患者版(SCID-I/NP)的酒精滥用和依赖模块的结构化临床访谈。
整个样本中有57%(n = 166)认可酒精滥用标准,25%(n = 65)认可酒精依赖标准。除一项(例如,酒精滥用标准2)外,拟合值总体上可以接受,这表明这些项目符合单维度的预期。主成分分析的检验未支持单维度性。项目-人员图显示项目的针对性较差。
酒精滥用和依赖标准似乎反映了一个单维度结构,这一发现支持了与DSM-5诊断模型一致的单一潜在结构或因素。