Suppr超能文献

修复后牙面的四年效果——一项海量数据分析。

Four-year outcomes of restored posterior tooth surfaces-a massive data analysis.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

AGENON Gesellschaft für Unternehmensentwicklung im Gesundheitswesen, Friedrichstraße 94, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Dec;21(9):2819-2825. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2084-4. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is only sparse knowledge concerning the outcomes of treatments with posterior permanent restorations in general practice settings. This study aimed at evaluating outcomes based on a large dataset by using a novel approach on a tooth surface basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study based on routine data from a major German national health insurance company. Respective treatment fee codes allowed for tracking the clinical courses on a tooth surface level. The study intervention was defined as the placement of a restoration on an interproximal or occlusal posterior tooth surface regardless of its actual extension and material on which no information was available. All surfaces restored between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2013 were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted to estimate four-year survival. The primary outcome was a restorative re-intervention on the same tooth surface. Separate analyses were performed for the secondary outcomes "crowning" and "extraction".

RESULTS

Over ten million interproximal surfaces and eight million occlusal surfaces in nine million posterior teeth had been restored. At 4 years, the cumulative survival rates concerning the primary outcome "re-intervention" for mesial surfaces (81.4%; CI 81.3-81.5%) and distal surfaces (81.2%; CI 81.1-81.2%) differed significantly from those for occlusal surfaces (77.0%; CI 76.9-77.0%). Restored surfaces in premolars showed significantly higher survival rates compared to molars. Four-year survival rates for the secondary outcome "crowning" were 91.9% (CI 91.8-91.9%) for mesial surfaces, 92.1% (CI 92.1-92.2%) for distal surfaces and 93.3% (CI 93.2-93.3%) for occlusal surfaces. The respective rates for the secondary outcome "extraction" were 94.5% (CI 94.5-94.5%) for mesial surfaces, 94.8% (CI 94.7-94.8%) for distal surfaces and 95.4% (CI 95.4-95.5%) for occlusal surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-interventions after restorative treatment play a significant role in general practice settings. Surface-related survival rates of restorations reveal a need for improvement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study allows the estimation of the probability of re-interventions after restoring posterior tooth surfaces. It is based on several million cases from general practises under the terms and conditions of a national health insurance system.

摘要

目的

关于一般实践中永久性后牙修复治疗结果的知识非常有限。本研究旨在通过基于牙面的新方法,利用大型数据集评估结果。

材料和方法

本研究基于德国主要国家健康保险公司的常规数据。各自的治疗费用代码允许在牙面水平上跟踪临床过程。研究干预措施被定义为在任何没有信息的情况下在近中或咬合后牙面上放置修复体,无论其实际扩展和材料如何。纳入 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日之间修复的所有表面。进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析以估计四年生存率。主要结局是同一牙面的修复再干预。分别对次要结局“冠修复”和“拔牙”进行分析。

结果

在 900 万颗后牙的近中表面和 800 万颗后牙的咬合表面上修复了超过 1000 万颗近中表面和 800 万颗咬合表面。在 4 年时,近中表面(81.4%;CI 81.3-81.5%)和远中表面(81.2%;CI 81.1-81.2%)的主要结局“再干预”的累积生存率与咬合表面的生存率(77.0%;CI 76.9-77.0%)有显著差异。前磨牙的修复表面显示出明显高于磨牙的存活率。次要结局“冠修复”的 4 年生存率为近中面 91.9%(CI 91.8-91.9%),远中面 92.1%(CI 92.1-92.2%)和咬合面 93.3%(CI 93.2-93.3%)。次要结局“拔牙”的相应比率为近中面 94.5%(CI 94.5-94.5%),远中面 94.8%(CI 94.7-94.8%)和咬合面 95.4%(CI 95.4-95.5%)。

结论

修复治疗后的再干预在一般实践中起着重要作用。与修复相关的修复体存活率表明需要改进。

临床相关性

本研究可以估计在后牙表面修复后进行再干预的概率。它基于国家健康保险制度规定和条件下的一般实践中的数百万例病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验