Arbiser Samuel
Dr. Luis Agote, 2437, 2°, Capital Federal, 1425, Argentina.
Int J Psychoanal. 2017 Feb;98(1):115-127. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12637.
The author places the subject of his paper in the context of the original views of a school of Argentinian psychoanalysts that differed from traditional conceptions of man and his relationship with the sociocultural context - that is, with reality. These were the analysts who followed Enrique Pichon Rivière and further developed his ideas - namely, Madeleine and Willy Baranger, José Bleger, and David Liberman. The author begins his exposition with a discussion of Pichon Rivière and culture. He then offers an outline of Pichon Rivière's particular conception of man, followed by a section on the Internal Group as the nexus between the psyche and reality. Further sections address the idea of reality in the analytic situation as a dynamic field and the operative definition of the transference; the distinction between perceptual reality and the reading of reality, with a consideration of the notion of 'critical judgement'; and lastly the issue of health and illness in terms of adaptation to reality. In addition, on the basis of a quotation from Antonio Damasio, the author draws a parallel between these psychoanalytic thinkers' 'psychosocial' approach to man and the findings of contemporary neuroscience as presented by one of its paradigmatic protagonists.
作者将其论文主题置于一群阿根廷精神分析学家的原始观点背景之下,这些观点有别于关于人类及其与社会文化背景(即与现实)关系的传统观念。这些精神分析学家追随恩里克·皮乔恩·里维耶,并进一步发展了他的思想,他们是玛德琳和威利·巴朗热、何塞·布莱格尔以及大卫·利伯曼。作者开篇讨论了皮乔恩·里维耶与文化,接着概述了皮乔恩·里维耶对人类的独特观念,随后是关于作为心理与现实之间纽带的内部群体的一节。后续章节探讨了分析情境中作为动态场域的现实观念以及移情的操作性定义;感知现实与对现实的解读之间的区别,并考量了“批判性判断”的概念;最后是关于适应现实方面的健康与疾病问题。此外,基于安东尼奥·达马西奥的一段引述,作者将这些精神分析思想家对人类的“社会心理”方法与当代神经科学的一位典范性主角所呈现的研究结果进行了类比。