Dendl Lena-Marie, Teufel Andreas, Schleder Stephan, Rennert Janine, Stroszczynski Christian, Mueller-Schilling Martina, Schreyer Andreas G
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany.
Rofo. 2017 Mar;189(3):239-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118884. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Evaluation of clinical impact regarding diagnostic and therapeutic changes influenced by interdisciplinary radiological case presentations. Prospective evaluation of radiological-gastrointestinal clinical case conferences over a 1-year period at a tertiary care center. We documented the preparation (phase 1) and clinical case conference (phase 2) regarding their impact on the radiology report and further diagnostic work-up and therapy. 1067 examinations were evaluated in 69 clinical case conferences including 487 cases. We calculated a mean time of 35.8 minutes per conference with 5.1 minutes per case for preparation. During phase 1, major changes compared to the previous report were found in 1.2 % of cases, and no change was found in 91.4 % of cases. In phase 2 an additional relevant finding was found in 0.6 % of cases, while there was no major change to the reports in 99 % of cases. We recommended further radiological diagnostic workup in 9 % of cases and interventional radiological examination in 2.7 % of cases, while no change was documented in 83.2 %. Further radiological or surgical therapy was recommended in 7 % and 6.8 % of cases, respectively. There was no change in therapy in 78.5 % of cases. The analysis of an interdisciplinary radiological case presentation in internal medicine shows that the case discussion with the radiologist results in a change in patient management in 37.3 % of cases (16.8 % diagnosis, 21.5 % therapy). Overall, interdisciplinary radiological clinical case conferences help to improve the management and quality of patient care. Our data support the broad implementation of radiological clinical case conferences. · The second opinion obtained during the preparation of a radiological case presentation does not change the written report in most cases.. · "Talking radiology" in radiological case presentations results in a significant change in patient management in over ⅓ of all cases.. · In radiological clinical case conferences an experienced radiologist can initiate diagnostic and interventional radiological methods that can be correctly implemented in therapeutic pathways.. · "Talking radiology" improves the quality of therapy and patient care.. · Dendl L. M., Teufel A., Schleder S. et al. Analysis of Radiological Case Presentations and their Impact on Therapy and Treatment Concepts in Internal Medicine. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 239 - 246.
评估跨学科放射学病例报告对诊断和治疗改变的临床影响。在一家三级医疗中心对为期1年的放射学 - 胃肠病临床病例讨论会进行前瞻性评估。我们记录了准备阶段(第1阶段)和临床病例讨论会(第2阶段),以及它们对放射学报告、进一步诊断检查和治疗的影响。在69次临床病例讨论会中评估了1067项检查,包括487个病例。我们计算出每次会议的平均时长为35.8分钟,每个病例的准备时间为5.1分钟。在第1阶段,与之前报告相比,1.2%的病例有重大改变,91.4%的病例无变化。在第2阶段,0.6%的病例发现了额外的相关发现,99%的病例报告无重大变化。我们建议9%的病例进行进一步的放射学诊断检查,2.7%的病例进行介入放射学检查,83.2%的病例无变化记录。分别有7%和6.8%的病例建议进行进一步的放射学或手术治疗。78.5%的病例治疗无变化。对内科跨学科放射学病例报告的分析表明,与放射科医生的病例讨论导致37.3%的病例患者管理发生改变(16.8%为诊断改变,21.5%为治疗改变)。总体而言,跨学科放射学临床病例讨论会有助于改善患者管理和护理质量。我们的数据支持广泛开展放射学临床病例讨论会。· 在准备放射学病例报告期间获得的第二种意见在大多数情况下不会改变书面报告。· 在放射学病例报告中“讨论放射学”导致超过三分之一的所有病例患者管理发生显著改变。· 在放射学临床病例讨论会中,经验丰富的放射科医生可以启动可在治疗路径中正确实施的诊断和介入放射学方法。· “讨论放射学”提高了治疗质量和患者护理水平。· 登德尔·L.M.、特费尔·A.、施莱德·S.等。内科放射学病例报告及其对治疗和治疗理念的影响分析。《德国放射学杂志》2017年;189:239 - 246。