Suppr超能文献

将研究从打屁股争论中转移出来。

Moving research beyond the spanking debate.

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, and of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster Innovation Park, Suite 201A, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.

Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Sep;71:5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

Despite numerous studies identifying a broad range of harms associated with the use of spanking and other types of physical punishment, debate continues about its use as a form of discipline. In this commentary, we recommend four strategies to move the field forward and beyond the spanking debate including: 1) use of methodological approaches that allow for stronger causal inference; 2) consideration of human rights issues; 3) a focus on understanding the causes of spanking and reasons for its decline in certain countries; and 4) more emphasis on evidence-based approaches to changing social norms to reject spanking as a form of discipline. Physical punishment needs to be recognized as an important public health problem.

摘要

尽管有大量研究确定了打屁股和其他类型的体罚与广泛的危害有关,但关于其作为一种纪律形式的使用仍存在争议。在这篇评论中,我们建议采取四项策略来推动该领域的发展,超越打屁股的争论,包括:1)使用允许更强因果推断的方法;2)考虑人权问题;3)关注理解打屁股的原因以及在某些国家其减少的原因;4)更加强调基于证据的方法,改变社会规范,拒绝打屁股作为一种纪律形式。体罚需要被视为一个重要的公共卫生问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验